Daily insights for city builders, delivered every morning at 6 AM ET. I’m Brandon Donnelly — a Toronto-based real estate developer and founder of Globizen. I’ve been writing here since 2013.

Living vs. just visiting — do these two things require different built environments?

Many years ago I was in a community meeting talking about a proposal we had to add retail uses adjacent to a park. Residential was the highest and best use, but we were excited by what retail could do for the project and area. We were imagining something like a Parisian cafe where everyone would sit facing outward toward the park.

Much to our surprise, the community was vehemently opposed. And when we eventually asked who had been to Europe and sat outside in a nice cafe, the response we generally got was, “yeah, we have, and it’s obviously nice there, when on vacation. But that’s Europe. It won’t work here and it’s not appropriate for the area.”

Hmm. This raises all sorts of interesting questions. But for today, let’s ask this one here: Why is it that some people choose to live in places that are so different than the ones they visit when on vacation?

Is it because we, as humans, want fundamentally different experiences when we travel? i.e. We want to escape from our current reality. “Oh look how novel this is.” In this case, I guess you could say that our markets are fairly efficient and people are getting the kind of lifestyles that they truly want, both at home and abroad.

Or, is it because, for a variety of reasons, we’ve created rules and obstacles that force certain built form outcomes? We think the other ways won’t work. I often find myself in this latter camp, meaning that when I travel, I at some point end up thinking: “This is a good idea. I want to both move here immediately, and steal this idea and bring it back to Toronto.”

How about you?

Photo by DAT VO on Unsplash

5 responses to “Living vs. just visiting — do these two things require different built environments?”

  1. johnbarnott Avatar
    johnbarnott

    We humans are inherently conservative – but we are seduced by novelty. How easy then to experiment elsewhere with no consequence to our home base.
    And of course there is Nimbyism!
    Good luck with your move.

  2. Leo Avatar
    Leo

    I’ve seen this same thing play out where I live. (Basically car-oriented, suburban city) I think this happens because when at home, a majority of people prioritize their homes (buy stuff) but when traveling, experiences become the priority.

  3. Bruce Atyeo Avatar
    Bruce Atyeo

    I’m with you on this one Brandon. Just build it. They will come.

  4. Jim Avatar
    Jim

    In my opinion, it shows how fearful people are of change. This leads to the idea that nothing is better than something that might be bad.

  5. Jason Paris Avatar

    People will call things like the King Transitway and talk of congestion charges as “city destroying” and then venture to cities that do these very things only to wish we were more like them. But rarely do we seem to attribute the policy choices that make those places different and often better. It’s parochialism and conservatism, but I think it is starting to change a bit too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *