According to recent data from Altus, Toronto recorded 42 new condominium sales in the month of May. That's a 97% decrease since May 2021, for a city of over 3 million people (city proper, not the metro area). So for all intents and purposes, the market is shut off. And it has resulted in upwards of 12,000 construction sector jobs disappearing over the last 12 months in Ontario. Moreover, it has left the Toronto Area with an unemployment rate that is close to 10%.

But that's not all.

The Missing Middle Initiative estimates that this dramatic decline in new home sales (which is more of a leading indicator than housing starts) could conservatively result in all three levels of government forgoing something like $6.6 billion in tax revenue each year. And within this lost revenue, there's something like a $2 billion reduction in revenue just from development charges (which don't get paid if developers aren't starting construction).

These are alarming figures that beg the question: How will government make up this shortfall? But once again, here's the thing. If development charges are intended to be "growth paying growth" then, in theory at least, development charge revenue shouldn't matter. The growth has disappeared and so the things that DCs pay for should also disappear — right?

In practice, we know that it's more nuanced than this and that growth pays for a lot of stuff. The clearest evidence of this is likely to rear its head when the DC funds run out. We're going to be forced to plug the hole with something else. So over the long term, I actually think this will prove to be a positive outcome for the housing market. Because it's going to necessarily wean us off the practice of overtaxing new homes.

According to recent data from Altus, Toronto recorded 42 new condominium sales in the month of May. That's a 97% decrease since May 2021, for a city of over 3 million people (city proper, not the metro area). So for all intents and purposes, the market is shut off. And it has resulted in upwards of 12,000 construction sector jobs disappearing over the last 12 months in Ontario. Moreover, it has left the Toronto Area with an unemployment rate that is close to 10%.

But that's not all.

The Missing Middle Initiative estimates that this dramatic decline in new home sales (which is more of a leading indicator than housing starts) could conservatively result in all three levels of government forgoing something like $6.6 billion in tax revenue each year. And within this lost revenue, there's something like a $2 billion reduction in revenue just from development charges (which don't get paid if developers aren't starting construction).

These are alarming figures that beg the question: How will government make up this shortfall? But once again, here's the thing. If development charges are intended to be "growth paying growth" then, in theory at least, development charge revenue shouldn't matter. The growth has disappeared and so the things that DCs pay for should also disappear — right?

In practice, we know that it's more nuanced than this and that growth pays for a lot of stuff. The clearest evidence of this is likely to rear its head when the DC funds run out. We're going to be forced to plug the hole with something else. So over the long term, I actually think this will prove to be a positive outcome for the housing market. Because it's going to necessarily wean us off the practice of overtaxing new homes.