Daily insights for city builders, delivered every morning at 6 AM ET. I’m Brandon Donnelly — a Toronto-based real estate developer and founder of Globizen. I’ve been writing here since 2013.

Cost-plus price floor

Oftentimes, it feels like there is a perception that developers price new housing with the fattest of margins. Meaning, if only developers were less greedy, housing could be more affordable. But as we have spoken about many times before, real estate development is a competitive industry; therefore, projects happen on the margin.

Ordinarily, the prices you see are the result of a cost-plus pricing strategy. Developers figure out what it will cost to build and develop, they add on a margin that they think their investors will accept, and then they determine what sticker prices they need to make the project financially feasible.

I’ve been writing about this approach for many years, but today it’s even more obvious. According to Urbanation’s Q1-2024 condominium report, new unsold condominium inventory in the GTA is currently sitting at approximately 23,815 units. This is up 30% YoY and is equal to about 23 months of supply. Two years ago in Q1-2022, this number had reached an 18-quarter low of 8,726 units.

Developers are highly motivated to sell and move their projects forward. Time is a killer, especially today. So the logical explanation for this rising inventory is simply that they can’t sell it. Their cost-plus pricing doesn’t overlap with what most buyers in the market are willing to pay. Like I said, development happens on the margin.

In theory, there is always a price where buyers would be willing to transact. If I listed a beautiful condominium for $100k today, many people would want to buy it. Supply would quickly run out. The problem is that no developer can build for this. There is always a very real price floor and, right now, that floor doesn’t seem to be low enough for many buyers.

2 responses to “Cost-plus price floor”

  1. johnbarnott Avatar
    johnbarnott


    You are partially right but your industry is subject to one of the least beneficial aspects of capitalism. You talk of the returns that your investors expect, but think of all the expectations down the supply chain. The price of construction materials has escalated >25% in 2023; how much of that was profit and/or dividends? Each additional step in the supply chain adds 2-10% just to finance the cost of capital at each layer.

    Henry Ford insisted on vertical integration for just this reason.

  2. Myron Nebozuk Avatar
    Myron Nebozuk

    Further to John Barnott’s comment, I recall a Construction Physics article that graphed two inflation rates in North America, starting in 1945, I believe. The first graph plotted consumer goods and services inflation. It was a line that moved upward at a shallow pitch. The second type of inflation was labelled construction inflation. It too angled upward but at a noticeably steeper pitch.

    Thanks to Brandon for introducing us to Brian Potter of Construction Physics. His articles are a joy to read; I always learn something.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *