comments 4

Nurx announces home testing kit

I have been debating whether I should continue writing about what is already on all of our minds, or if I should focus my attention on positivity and humor. The latter is hugely important at a time like this, which is why I have been trying to intersperse my thoughts, both here and on Twitter, with things like funny videos, dance music, and architecture.

But the reality is that none of us know how this is all going to play out. As I mentioned yesterday, very few of us have a mental model for this kind of macro event. So it’s important for all of us to continue learning. Is our country taking the right approach? Are we doing enough? How long are we going to have to live like this and what does that mean for the global economy?

The Financial Times published an invaluable story earlier this week about a small town outside of Venice called, Vò. With only 3,300 people, the town was supposedly able to test and retest all of its residents while the rest of northern Italy was growing as an epicenter for the Wuhan virus.

In late February, they completed their first round of testing and found that about 3% of the town had been infected. But it’s important to note that about 50% of those that were infected were completely asymptomatic! However, because everyone was tested, the asymptomatic people got immediately quarantined.

The town did a second round of testing about 10 days later and that point the infection rate had dropped to about 0.3%. Of course, if all those asymptomatic people had been out and about in the town of Vò, this would not have been the case. There now appears to be no new cases in Vò.

It is for this reason that the WHO is urging diligent and repeated testing. But that obviously needs to be done in a sensible way. Having people line up — together — for hours upon hours is an obvious problem. Most people are not getting tested.

Earlier this morning, San Francisco-based Nurx announced a home testing kit for the Wuhan virus. Supposedly it is the first of its kind in the US. (It’s not yet available in Canada — I asked). I don’t know how available it is to Americans or how accurate it is, yet, but I do know that something like this needs to become widespread.

4 Comments

  1. Robert W J Brown

    Check out NURX online customer comments for other home test kits eg pregnancy
    NURX is not a member of the US BBB. For $180 you get what you pay for

    Like

  2. NomadArchitect

    Great post as always.

    Can I add though, that like the 1918 Influenza pandemic is avoided as being called as the “Spanish Flu” anymore, I think calling the current pandemic virus of 2020 as the “Wuhan virus” is culturally inappropriate, insensitive and could lead into prejudice towards the folks coming from that part of the world, Wuhan or otherwise?

    Can I suggest instead to appropriately call the virus by its actual name, COVID-19? It’s accurate as this virus has no pre-supposed selection on who and where it can infect.

    Looking forward to your next insights in real-estate and architecture in the future! 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Jonnel Mamauag

    I see your point. But making it (the practice of naming) common does not make it appropriate at times, and simply normalizes if any, its understated prejudice. The link you recently added as well falls into the same mindset that I established on my previous comment.

    In the case of the Ebola virus, I read a story (see https://www.livescience.com/48234-how-ebola-got-its-name.html) that it was named after a river instead of the village where the virus originated to avoid stigmatizing the area and the people living there. There was some level of care and sensitivity that the health workers exercised, even in their fatigued state.

    This may be not of the highest priority in combating this current pandemic but sending the “appropriate” message is necessary to maintain composure in high-stress times.

    It would be good to get those home test kits, though.

    Like

  4. Pingback: Leveraging mobile phone data during a pandemic | BRANDON DONNELLY

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s