Daily insights for city builders, delivered every morning at 6 AM ET. I’m Brandon Donnelly — a Toronto-based real estate developer and founder of Globizen. I’ve been writing here since 2013.

More lights on buildings!

Back in undergrad, I spent a summer living and working in Taipei and Hong Kong. It was my first time being in either of these cities and I absolutely loved it. I was studying architecture. I was really developing my love of big cities. And these felt like two very real and big cities.

Below is a cheesy tourist photo that I paid someone to take of me from the Kowloon Pier. I still have access to it because obviously my mom has it framed and prominently displayed in her kitchen:

I’m sharing this photo because one of the things that really stood out to me about Hong Kong, in particular, was how they lit their buildings. There were neon signs (which is something that Hong Kong is, or least was, famous for); lights shining up into the sky (bad, I know); and full light shows and animations across entire building elevations.

I immediately thought to myself: “Why don’t we have fun like this? Especially considering that Toronto can get kind of dark during the winter.”

Well, some twenty years later, we are now starting to have more lights. We fought hard for our placemaking sign at Junction House. The CN Tower has since been illuminated. And most recently, we got 160 Front Street West. But it turns out that building lights can be a little divisive:

My view is exactly what it was when I first landed in hot and humid Hong Kong. And so I respectfully disagree with Jocelyn Squires (though I have great admiration for her work). Architectural lighting adds color and dynamism to our cities. It can also help our cities from all looking the same.

Let’s stop being so conservative and have some fun. Nice work, 160 Front.

3 responses to “More lights on buildings!”

  1. Lloyd Alter Avatar

    I think it is an example of Jevon’s Paradox on steroids, with LEDs getting more efficient so we put them everywhere including the exterior of buildings, burning electricity and blotting out the sky without doing anything useful, because we can. https://www.treehugger.com/too-much-good-thing-leds-on-buildings-5120955

    1. Brandon Graham Donnelly Avatar

      I believe they do something useful. But I of course understand your perspective.

  2. AM Avatar
    AM

    Like everything, in moderation. It’s puzzling that we think nothing of Dundas square’s giant ad displays or many enormous and bright corporate logos on buildings, but we fret when someone actually does something creative with lighting (much the same way people bitched about Aura’s lighting a few years – I remember a very angry column by Bozikovic about it).

    If the concern is the environment, it can be shut down late at night and/or during migration season, but I agree with Brandon, sometimes we get way too caught up in one aspect and forget to consider others.

    What happened to civic pride? There are a lot of benefits to be derived from a city that proudly displays itself to the world. This is one way to do it and I’d argue a pretty innocuous one at that. I think it’s a great addition to the skyline and far better than many of the other recent ones.

    I tend to forget we live in Canada where not making waves is the norm and anything that stands out is immediately shut down as being too “something”, as we focus on the negatives and always overlook the positives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *