Daily insights for city builders, delivered every morning at 6 AM ET. I’m Brandon Donnelly — a Toronto-based real estate developer and founder of Globizen. I’ve been writing here since 2013.

XS in Philadelphia, not Tokyo

This is the sort of housing project that you’d fully expect to find in Tokyo. Seven homes built on a small urban lot measuring only 11 feet wide by 93 feet deep. But in this case, it’s not Tokyo; it’s Chinatown, Philadelphia, where a residual lot that was created when the sunken Vine Street Expressway was carved through the middle of the city in the 1950s.

Designed by Philadelphia-based Interface Studio Architects (ISA), the project contains 7 levels of livable space. What’s interesting, though, is that from a building code perspective this is still a 4-story building. There are two mezzanine levels that don’t get counted (and that create some great double-height spaces). This also seems to be what allowed them to get away with a single egress stair in the middle of the building.

The other technique that was used to maximum density is facade projections. Philadelphia’s zoning code allows for projections up to 3 feet in the horizontal dimension. And if you look at the above plans, you’ll see that these were used to “top up” or extend the site’s 11 foot width to 14 feet, when it made sense to do so from a programming standpoint. The result is some very livable spaces.

I am endlessly fascinated by these sorts of projects because they demand creativity and because you ultimately end up unlocking something that the market had been overlooking. Here is an example of a small leftover urban parcel that was previously used as surface parking for two cars. Now it’s seven beautiful homes.

Photos/drawings: ISA

4 responses to “XS in Philadelphia, not Tokyo”

  1. ncohen226 Avatar
    ncohen226

    lovely well done project. Thanks for sharing

    1. Brandon Graham Donnelly Avatar

      We need more of these types of projects.

  2. gahack Avatar


    Great project. Philly has a long history of tiny houses, notably the Trinities with one room on each of 3 stories, typically 13 or 14 ft wide. I lived in a 13 ft wide house with 6 levels of living space in the Rittenhouse Square area. it kept me fit. These narrow houses were precipitated by the 19th Century tax rule that charged considerably more for houses 15 ft or more.

    Gary Hack gahack@design.upenn.edu

    1. Brandon Graham Donnelly Avatar

      Thanks Gary. That’s interesting. 13-14 feet doesn’t seem that narrow based on today’s standards!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *