Image Source: Vancouver by Marc M on 500px
According to a recent Bloomberg article, this is where the rich are putting their money today:
“The two greatest stores of wealth internationally today is contemporary art….. and I don’t mean that as a joke, I mean that as a serious asset class,” said Fink. “And two, the other store of wealth today is apartments in Manhattan, apartments in Vancouver, in London.”
In case you wondering, Laurence Fink is the founder and CEO of BlackRock Inc., which today is the largest asset manager in the world. They have over $4.77 trillion in assets under management according to their website. That’s a mind boggling number.
And if you read the Bloomberg article cited above, you’ll see that this interest in both art and apartments represents a shift away from gold as the de facto safe haven.
“Historically gold was a great instrument for storing of wealth,” the chairman of BlackRock Inc. said at a conference in Singapore on Tuesday. “Gold has lost its luster and there’s other mechanisms in which you can store wealth that are inflation-adjusted.”
What’s interesting and probably most relevant to the Architect This City community though is this investment focus on apartments.
When people talk about a possible housing bubble in Canada they often cite house prices to median household income as a key ratio. The question then becomes: How can house prices be such a high multiple relative to local incomes?
That’s relevant, but it’s not the entire story for cities like New York, London, and Vancouver. That ratio alone assumes that real estate isn’t a global investment vehicle. And for some people people it is exactly that.
Recent US Census Bureau data has once again confirmed that there’s a growing preference for living in urban cores. More specifically:
It finds that population growth has been shifting to the core counties of the USA’s 381 metro areas, especially since the economic recovery began gaining steam in 2010. Basically, the USA’s urban core is getting denser, while far-flung suburbs watch their growth dwindle.
To put numbers to these statements, core counties in the US grew approximately 2.7% and outlying counties grew approximately 1.9% from 2010-2013. Most of the growth came from net migration, as opposed to higher birth rates.
The two big factors at play–which will be obvious to readers of this blog–appear to be both a desire to live in amenity rich and walkable communities and a continuing trend towards marrying and having kids later in life, which can often be the trigger for moving to the suburbs.
But the big question is whether or not this trend is here to stay or if it’s an ephemeral fad caused by a bunch of over-educated and under-employed Millennials refusing to grow up. I would argue that it’s not a fad.
If there’s a clear consumer preference for urban neighborhoods, then I don’t think people are just going to pick up and leave overnight. As long as there’s adequate housing within the means of growing families, I think they’re going to stay in or go to the areas in which they truly want to live.
There are also many other macroeconomic trends reinforcing this shift. Just yesterday, Richard Florida wrote an article in Atlantic Cities talking about how venture capital investment is shifting away from the suburbs, towards city centers and walkable communities. These companies (receiving investment) are the next generation of employers and they’re starting in core areas.
I’ll take that as a leading indicator.
Transit planning is absolutely and utterly broken in Toronto. Over the past few years, it has become abundantly clear that our current methods are completely ineffectual. We’re entirely useless at delivering transit infrastructure to the most important economic region in Canada.
The process is deeply political, and with all three levels of government involved, as well as countless agencies, we’re getting absolutely nothing done. And when we do manage to achieve some level of progress, such as provincial funding for the Scarborough subway line, it turns out that fact and evidence would suggest we’re actually headed in the wrong direction.
It’s an unfortunate situation that we’ve gotten ourselves into, because transit and infrastructure have such a profound impact on productivity levels and our economy as a whole. And yet we’re just sitting back while our politicians fight over transit investment according to what best suits their voter bases.
Politicians should not be making these decisions. At this point they’ve proven their inability to make effective progress and so I believe we need to strip them of this responsibility. Part of the problem is that we have a mismatch of time horizons: politicians need quick wins, while transit investment is a long term game.
What we need is an entity - ideally one entity - that isn’t reliant on ad hoc funding hand outs. It needs a sustainable funding source and the power to make decisions about where infrastructure investments will be made in our region. We can’t continue to screw this up. Transit is far too important.
Image Source: Vancouver by Marc M on 500px
According to a recent Bloomberg article, this is where the rich are putting their money today:
“The two greatest stores of wealth internationally today is contemporary art….. and I don’t mean that as a joke, I mean that as a serious asset class,” said Fink. “And two, the other store of wealth today is apartments in Manhattan, apartments in Vancouver, in London.”
In case you wondering, Laurence Fink is the founder and CEO of BlackRock Inc., which today is the largest asset manager in the world. They have over $4.77 trillion in assets under management according to their website. That’s a mind boggling number.
And if you read the Bloomberg article cited above, you’ll see that this interest in both art and apartments represents a shift away from gold as the de facto safe haven.
“Historically gold was a great instrument for storing of wealth,” the chairman of BlackRock Inc. said at a conference in Singapore on Tuesday. “Gold has lost its luster and there’s other mechanisms in which you can store wealth that are inflation-adjusted.”
What’s interesting and probably most relevant to the Architect This City community though is this investment focus on apartments.
When people talk about a possible housing bubble in Canada they often cite house prices to median household income as a key ratio. The question then becomes: How can house prices be such a high multiple relative to local incomes?
That’s relevant, but it’s not the entire story for cities like New York, London, and Vancouver. That ratio alone assumes that real estate isn’t a global investment vehicle. And for some people people it is exactly that.
Recent US Census Bureau data has once again confirmed that there’s a growing preference for living in urban cores. More specifically:
It finds that population growth has been shifting to the core counties of the USA’s 381 metro areas, especially since the economic recovery began gaining steam in 2010. Basically, the USA’s urban core is getting denser, while far-flung suburbs watch their growth dwindle.
To put numbers to these statements, core counties in the US grew approximately 2.7% and outlying counties grew approximately 1.9% from 2010-2013. Most of the growth came from net migration, as opposed to higher birth rates.
The two big factors at play–which will be obvious to readers of this blog–appear to be both a desire to live in amenity rich and walkable communities and a continuing trend towards marrying and having kids later in life, which can often be the trigger for moving to the suburbs.
But the big question is whether or not this trend is here to stay or if it’s an ephemeral fad caused by a bunch of over-educated and under-employed Millennials refusing to grow up. I would argue that it’s not a fad.
If there’s a clear consumer preference for urban neighborhoods, then I don’t think people are just going to pick up and leave overnight. As long as there’s adequate housing within the means of growing families, I think they’re going to stay in or go to the areas in which they truly want to live.
There are also many other macroeconomic trends reinforcing this shift. Just yesterday, Richard Florida wrote an article in Atlantic Cities talking about how venture capital investment is shifting away from the suburbs, towards city centers and walkable communities. These companies (receiving investment) are the next generation of employers and they’re starting in core areas.
I’ll take that as a leading indicator.
Transit planning is absolutely and utterly broken in Toronto. Over the past few years, it has become abundantly clear that our current methods are completely ineffectual. We’re entirely useless at delivering transit infrastructure to the most important economic region in Canada.
The process is deeply political, and with all three levels of government involved, as well as countless agencies, we’re getting absolutely nothing done. And when we do manage to achieve some level of progress, such as provincial funding for the Scarborough subway line, it turns out that fact and evidence would suggest we’re actually headed in the wrong direction.
It’s an unfortunate situation that we’ve gotten ourselves into, because transit and infrastructure have such a profound impact on productivity levels and our economy as a whole. And yet we’re just sitting back while our politicians fight over transit investment according to what best suits their voter bases.
Politicians should not be making these decisions. At this point they’ve proven their inability to make effective progress and so I believe we need to strip them of this responsibility. Part of the problem is that we have a mismatch of time horizons: politicians need quick wins, while transit investment is a long term game.
What we need is an entity - ideally one entity - that isn’t reliant on ad hoc funding hand outs. It needs a sustainable funding source and the power to make decisions about where infrastructure investments will be made in our region. We can’t continue to screw this up. Transit is far too important.
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog