If I had to pick only one social network to use, it would be Twitter. I, of course, also enjoy Instagram because I like taking photos. But if I had to pick one, it would be Twitter.

I just find that Instagram is more about passive consumption (like watching TV), whereas on Twitter I've found a way to actively engage in productive discussions around the topics that interest me -- everything from real estate and architecture to NFTs and photography.

The crypto community is also very centered around Twitter. I haven't looked at the numbers, but I would think that NFT activity has been, or at least should be, a boon for the company. That said, Twitter has never really been a great business and public company.

But maybe that changes now that Elon Musk has become its largest shareholder with a 9.2% stake in the company (currently valued at a few billion). The stock jumped over 27% today. Or maybe it doesn't change at all and this is just a fun side hustle for Elon.

Here is a typically funny explanation from Matt Levine introducing what just happened:

Look this all makes complete sense, obvious, intuitive, simple sense. If you are the richest person in the world, and annoying, and you constantly play a computer game, and you get a lot of enjoyment and a sense of identity from that game and are maybe a little addicted, then at some point you might have some suggestions for improvements in the game. So you might leave comments and email the company that makes the game saying “hey you should try my ideas.” And the company might ignore you (or respond politely but not move fast enough for your liking). It might occur to you: “Look, I am the richest person in the world; how much could this game company possibly cost? I should just buy it and change the game however I want.” Even if your complaints are quite minor, why shouldn’t you get to play exactly the game you want? Even if you have no complaints, why not own the game you love, just to make sure it continues to be exactly what you want? The game is Twitter, the richest person in the world is Elon Musk...

This is an interesting perspective. It is from Fred Wilson’s annual what-happened-this-past-year post:

But here is the thing about speculative frenzies – they are generally directionally correct but off in their order of magnitude. And they finance the trend that they are directionally correct about. It may be the case that Tesla’s market capitalization is too high, but that allows Tesla to raise $10bn without diluting more than a few percentage points. And that $10bn will go towards accelerating the conversion of the auto industry from carbon-based fuel to renewable energy. And that is a good thing for society.

When I first read this my mind immediately went to tulip mania. Was that directionally correct? Did tulip bulbs ultimately rebound and maintain their value over the long-run? I actually don’t know.

But if you think about the dot-com bubble, that was directionally correct. Sure, infamous “companies” like Pets.com never ended up going anywhere, but the idea of tech and the internet becoming dominant was absolutely right.

Fast forward twenty years and you can be sure that many people are now buying their pet supplies online, along with pretty much everything else. Sometimes we simply overshoot and get the timing wrong.

This is perhaps a good thought for all of us to consider as we welcome 2021 and say goodbye to what was one weird and terrible year.

Being directionally correct means that it’s okay for there to be bumps, mistakes, and speculative frenzies along the way. They are expected. What matters is the path forward.

Happy new year, everyone.

This pandemic seems to have been good for real estate located in places that people like to spend time in, but maybe had to limit their time there in the past because of things they had to do like, you know, work in an office. This includes everywhere from "cottage country" outside of Toronto to sunny destinations like Miami.

Here are some figures that I came across for South Florida via Analytics Miami. Comparing November 2020 to a year prior, condo transaction volumes in Miami-Dade country are, interestingly, up 4.3% for condos less than $1 million and up 61.4% for condos worth more than $1 million.

Somewhat similarly, single family home transaction volumes in Miami-Dade county (for the same time period) are down 5.2% for houses worth less than $1 million and up 100% for houses worth more than $1 million.

Sometimes you see a decline like this (the -5.2%) because there simply aren't enough houses on the market for less than $1 million. But it could also be that more rich people are looking for expensive properties in Miami compared to last year.

As you may have gathered from here and here and here, I'm not all that bullish on the permanency of this whole working from home thing. But there's no denying that there's a very clear trend around people moving to places that are warmer. This was happening well before COVID-19.

There is also some evidence that rich people are starting (continuing?) to eschew high tax states like California for lower tax states like Florida and Texas. I don't have the data to be able to comment on how meaningful this trend is, but, for whatever it's worth, apparently Elon Musk just moved to Austin.

Photo by aurora.kreativ on Unsplash