This month’s issue of Monocle Magazine has a feature on a new masterplanned community to the north of Cartagena called Serena del Mar. Currently under construction, the entire 971 hectare community is slated to be finished by 2030. When complete the developers believe it will house upwards of 200,000 people — effectively an entirely new city.
It will also be entirely self-governing. There will be no mayor or city council. Revenue to operate the community will be collected through a mandatory monthly fee, though low-income residents will be exempt from paying it. As I understand it, large projects in Colombia have historically been mired in corruption issues, and so this is probably a response to that.
But the approach has naturally caused a bunch of skepticism. Does this bifurcate the city between public and private? Is this a vote of no confidence on Cartagena's current governance structures? Building a city from scratch is also exceptionally difficult (there's a quote in Monocle from Toronto's own Shawn Micallef on this). Cities usually take time to evolve and settle in.
This month’s issue of Monocle Magazine has a feature on a new masterplanned community to the north of Cartagena called Serena del Mar. Currently under construction, the entire 971 hectare community is slated to be finished by 2030. When complete the developers believe it will house upwards of 200,000 people — effectively an entirely new city.
It will also be entirely self-governing. There will be no mayor or city council. Revenue to operate the community will be collected through a mandatory monthly fee, though low-income residents will be exempt from paying it. As I understand it, large projects in Colombia have historically been mired in corruption issues, and so this is probably a response to that.
But the approach has naturally caused a bunch of skepticism. Does this bifurcate the city between public and private? Is this a vote of no confidence on Cartagena's current governance structures? Building a city from scratch is also exceptionally difficult (there's a quote in Monocle from Toronto's own Shawn Micallef on this). Cities usually take time to evolve and settle in.
I don't know enough (or anything, really) about Colombia, Cartagena, and this development project to comment specifically. And so I won't. But these are the questions that are being asked of contemporary masterplans. There's a reason most (or all) of the tech companies involved in large scale masterplans have banned the word "campus" from their lexicons.
Last month the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment that would have permitted laneway suites as-of-right in Toronto was deferred by Community Council.
So the “Changing Lanes” policy has been updated – to obviously make it more restrictive – and it will head back to Toronto and East York Community Council this week on Wednesday, June 6th.
Lanescape did a great job summarizing some of the updates on their blog. Here are a couple of their images:
I don't know enough (or anything, really) about Colombia, Cartagena, and this development project to comment specifically. And so I won't. But these are the questions that are being asked of contemporary masterplans. There's a reason most (or all) of the tech companies involved in large scale masterplans have banned the word "campus" from their lexicons.
Last month the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment that would have permitted laneway suites as-of-right in Toronto was deferred by Community Council.
So the “Changing Lanes” policy has been updated – to obviously make it more restrictive – and it will head back to Toronto and East York Community Council this week on Wednesday, June 6th.
Lanescape did a great job summarizing some of the updates on their blog. Here are a couple of their images:
New rental housing measures were approved by Vancouver City Council this week. I haven't gone through the policies in the detail (you can do that here), but they aim to increase rental housing supply by doing things such as "pre-zoning" for 6-storeys on main streets and by allowing rental apartments to be built on some side streets (up to 150m away from arterial roads).
Enabling new rental housing in all neighbourhoods would support an increase in supply and choice. The incentive programs have concentrated secured market rental development in selected neighbourhoods and along arterial streets. This has been effective at creating larger multi-unit projects, but has created an inequitable environment, where renters have limited housing choice. Expanding program coverage into low density areas, areas zoned for single detached housing and non-arterial locations to allow for a greater mix of structure types and densities (e.g. townhouses, small apartment buildings) are important considerations moving forward.
It is yet another data point for what I wrote about here -- the loosening of single-family zoning. Turns out, it can be difficult to meet the demand for new housing when you set aside a large part -- or most -- of your land for low-rise single-family homes. And there seems to be growing acknowledgement of that on the part of cities.
If you haven’t already, now is the time to write your local Councillor and TEYCC to tell them that you support laneway suites and the proposed Changing Lanes policy. I did that last month and I did it again this month. I hope that many of you will do the same.
New rental housing measures were approved by Vancouver City Council this week. I haven't gone through the policies in the detail (you can do that here), but they aim to increase rental housing supply by doing things such as "pre-zoning" for 6-storeys on main streets and by allowing rental apartments to be built on some side streets (up to 150m away from arterial roads).
Enabling new rental housing in all neighbourhoods would support an increase in supply and choice. The incentive programs have concentrated secured market rental development in selected neighbourhoods and along arterial streets. This has been effective at creating larger multi-unit projects, but has created an inequitable environment, where renters have limited housing choice. Expanding program coverage into low density areas, areas zoned for single detached housing and non-arterial locations to allow for a greater mix of structure types and densities (e.g. townhouses, small apartment buildings) are important considerations moving forward.
It is yet another data point for what I wrote about here -- the loosening of single-family zoning. Turns out, it can be difficult to meet the demand for new housing when you set aside a large part -- or most -- of your land for low-rise single-family homes. And there seems to be growing acknowledgement of that on the part of cities.
If you haven’t already, now is the time to write your local Councillor and TEYCC to tell them that you support laneway suites and the proposed Changing Lanes policy. I did that last month and I did it again this month. I hope that many of you will do the same.
