Brandon Donnelly
Daily insights for city builders. Published since 2013 by Toronto-based real estate developer Brandon Donnelly.
Brandon Donnelly
Daily insights for city builders. Published since 2013 by Toronto-based real estate developer Brandon Donnelly.
Bianca and I we were walking home from dinner at a friend's place the other night -- which we see as one of the great perks of living in the city in a walkable neighborhood -- and we stumbled upon a new bar in Koreatown on Bloor Street. Neither of us had heard of the place before, but there was loud electronic music emanating from the building and an obscene amount of neon-like lights inside, and so naturally we decided to investigate it further.
We immediately crossed the street, walked inside, and found this:


This, it turns out, is a cyberpunk-themed bar called Zui Beer Bar. They have another location at Yonge & Finch, which is arguably now a bigger Koreatown than our older one here on Bloor, and so this is their latest location. It only opened a few weeks ago.
They serve asian street food (which we didn't try since we were full from a wonderful dinner). They're also very obviously trying to create a fun party vibe. On every table is a light. The QR code is how you order things. But there's also the option of alternating the light between yellow and purple. Yellow means you want to be left alone. And purple means, "come join our table." It's a bit like the Grizzly House in Banff where every table has a phone and making cold calls is encouraged.

It's the kind of bar and restaurant that will transport you into a different world. I was imaging that we were in a John Wick movie discussing some sinister plot. And at some point, we were going to get up, tug on one of the infinity neon art pieces, and then be led down a secret passage to people of questionable moral fiber. That never happened, but we loved the music and we loved that the owners just went for it.
At the very least, it will make you feel like you're in some futuristic Asian city. The kind that would have LED dragons animating across their downtown office towers.

This week we speak about the problem of not enough density next to transit stations. More specifically, we spoke about Toronto's low-rise residential neighborhoods, which are colored yellow in the city's Official Plan. Well, as many of you know, the city is, in fact, working to "expand housing options" in these neighhorhoods through their EHON program. One component of the program covers laneway and garden suites, another covers multiplexes (up to fourplexes), and another hopes to allow 6-story apartment buildings on all major streets.
Here are the city's major streets:

Bianca and I we were walking home from dinner at a friend's place the other night -- which we see as one of the great perks of living in the city in a walkable neighborhood -- and we stumbled upon a new bar in Koreatown on Bloor Street. Neither of us had heard of the place before, but there was loud electronic music emanating from the building and an obscene amount of neon-like lights inside, and so naturally we decided to investigate it further.
We immediately crossed the street, walked inside, and found this:


This, it turns out, is a cyberpunk-themed bar called Zui Beer Bar. They have another location at Yonge & Finch, which is arguably now a bigger Koreatown than our older one here on Bloor, and so this is their latest location. It only opened a few weeks ago.
They serve asian street food (which we didn't try since we were full from a wonderful dinner). They're also very obviously trying to create a fun party vibe. On every table is a light. The QR code is how you order things. But there's also the option of alternating the light between yellow and purple. Yellow means you want to be left alone. And purple means, "come join our table." It's a bit like the Grizzly House in Banff where every table has a phone and making cold calls is encouraged.

It's the kind of bar and restaurant that will transport you into a different world. I was imaging that we were in a John Wick movie discussing some sinister plot. And at some point, we were going to get up, tug on one of the infinity neon art pieces, and then be led down a secret passage to people of questionable moral fiber. That never happened, but we loved the music and we loved that the owners just went for it.
At the very least, it will make you feel like you're in some futuristic Asian city. The kind that would have LED dragons animating across their downtown office towers.

This week we speak about the problem of not enough density next to transit stations. More specifically, we spoke about Toronto's low-rise residential neighborhoods, which are colored yellow in the city's Official Plan. Well, as many of you know, the city is, in fact, working to "expand housing options" in these neighhorhoods through their EHON program. One component of the program covers laneway and garden suites, another covers multiplexes (up to fourplexes), and another hopes to allow 6-story apartment buildings on all major streets.
Here are the city's major streets:


This obviously isn't a fatal flaw. It remains a wonderful street. And there are lots of examples of thriving one-sided retail streets. Ocean Drive in Miami Beach immediately comes to mind (notwithstanding the fact that locals tend not to go to it).
But conventional retail wisdom does dictate that two sides are better than one. Consider this 2023 report by Cushman & Wakefield ranking the top global main streets across the world. All of the streets that I have been to before are two-sided:
5th Avenue in New York between 49th and 60th (above 60th is, incidentally, when the street converts to single-sided because of Central Park)
Montenapoleone in Milan
The main street of Tsim Sha Tsui in Hong Kong
New Bond Street in London
Avenues des Champs-Élysées in Paris
Grafton Street in in Dublin
Passeig de Gracia in Barcelona
Bloor Street in Toronto
These are all two-sided retail streets.
None of this is to say that the west side of Roncesvalles has nothing going on. It has a diverse mixture of uses, including churches, libraries, apartments, and many other things. But I think there is still an argument to be made that it has been hamstrung by restrictive zoning.
That said, Roncevalles is defined as a "major street" in Toronto's Official Plan and so it does fall under the city's new Major Street Study. Maybe that changes things.
And here's what these "small-scale apartments" might look like:


The setbacks are intended to be 6m in the front (to be consistent with existing neighborhood setbacks); 1.8m on the sides (so there's rear access and so that these elevations only get fenestration for secondary rooms); and 7.5m in the back (which is consistent with the current mid-rise guidelines). Now, directionally, and without referring to any of the specific details, this is good. Toronto's major streets are, in most cases, painfully underdeveloped; the existing built form feels generally entirely out of place. But the important question remains: Will developers actually build these at scale?
Bloor Street and Danforth Avenue, for example, already allow mid-rise buildings that, for the most part, are bigger than what is being proposed here as part of the EHON program. But again, they remain underdeveloped. And there's a subway running underneath these streets! So why will it be any different on our other major streets? One key difference is that these small-scale apartments are expected to be fully as-of-right. Meaning, no rezoning process and no community meetings. This will save a lot of time and money.
Still, this is almost certainly going to require some iterative finessing to get it right. I think you'll see developers looking to do little to no parking, no basements, no dedicated loading areas (certainly no type "G" spaces), slab-on-grade construction, and standardized and repeatable designs. And even then, this may not be enough. Rental replacement policies are yet another major barrier to consider. It's going to have to be all about speed and efficiency, which is why it will likely also create a greater push to rethink some building code items, such as the requirement for two means of egress.
At the end of the day, I want something like this to happen. It would increase housing supply, and make Toronto far more vibrant and far more conducive to non-driving forms of mobility. It's, no doubt, a really positive thing. But for this to become a reality, it needs to work at scale. Meaning, the development pro formas need to work at scale, and with sufficient margin that developers won't just automatically look to other opportunities. If the development community can make money building this housing typology, they will look for every opportunity to build it. But if they can't make money, they won't. It's as simple as that.
Images: City of Toronto

This obviously isn't a fatal flaw. It remains a wonderful street. And there are lots of examples of thriving one-sided retail streets. Ocean Drive in Miami Beach immediately comes to mind (notwithstanding the fact that locals tend not to go to it).
But conventional retail wisdom does dictate that two sides are better than one. Consider this 2023 report by Cushman & Wakefield ranking the top global main streets across the world. All of the streets that I have been to before are two-sided:
5th Avenue in New York between 49th and 60th (above 60th is, incidentally, when the street converts to single-sided because of Central Park)
Montenapoleone in Milan
The main street of Tsim Sha Tsui in Hong Kong
New Bond Street in London
Avenues des Champs-Élysées in Paris
Grafton Street in in Dublin
Passeig de Gracia in Barcelona
Bloor Street in Toronto
These are all two-sided retail streets.
None of this is to say that the west side of Roncesvalles has nothing going on. It has a diverse mixture of uses, including churches, libraries, apartments, and many other things. But I think there is still an argument to be made that it has been hamstrung by restrictive zoning.
That said, Roncevalles is defined as a "major street" in Toronto's Official Plan and so it does fall under the city's new Major Street Study. Maybe that changes things.
And here's what these "small-scale apartments" might look like:


The setbacks are intended to be 6m in the front (to be consistent with existing neighborhood setbacks); 1.8m on the sides (so there's rear access and so that these elevations only get fenestration for secondary rooms); and 7.5m in the back (which is consistent with the current mid-rise guidelines). Now, directionally, and without referring to any of the specific details, this is good. Toronto's major streets are, in most cases, painfully underdeveloped; the existing built form feels generally entirely out of place. But the important question remains: Will developers actually build these at scale?
Bloor Street and Danforth Avenue, for example, already allow mid-rise buildings that, for the most part, are bigger than what is being proposed here as part of the EHON program. But again, they remain underdeveloped. And there's a subway running underneath these streets! So why will it be any different on our other major streets? One key difference is that these small-scale apartments are expected to be fully as-of-right. Meaning, no rezoning process and no community meetings. This will save a lot of time and money.
Still, this is almost certainly going to require some iterative finessing to get it right. I think you'll see developers looking to do little to no parking, no basements, no dedicated loading areas (certainly no type "G" spaces), slab-on-grade construction, and standardized and repeatable designs. And even then, this may not be enough. Rental replacement policies are yet another major barrier to consider. It's going to have to be all about speed and efficiency, which is why it will likely also create a greater push to rethink some building code items, such as the requirement for two means of egress.
At the end of the day, I want something like this to happen. It would increase housing supply, and make Toronto far more vibrant and far more conducive to non-driving forms of mobility. It's, no doubt, a really positive thing. But for this to become a reality, it needs to work at scale. Meaning, the development pro formas need to work at scale, and with sufficient margin that developers won't just automatically look to other opportunities. If the development community can make money building this housing typology, they will look for every opportunity to build it. But if they can't make money, they won't. It's as simple as that.
Images: City of Toronto
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog