Resonance Consultancy, which is a placemaking firm that we have spoken about before on the blog, is working on a new America's Best Cities report. And as part of this, they've been surveying Americans about which cities they would most like to live in and visit. The result is a list of the most "desirable" US cities that looks like this:
New York
Miami
Los Angeles
Las Vegas
San Diego
Chicago
Seattle
San Francisco
Houston
Denver
The long and the short of it seems to be that people generally want to live in the places where they like to travel. But what's interesting is that if you look at the US cities that have actually grown the most in absolute numbers over the last few years (specifically April 2020 to July 2023), the list transforms into this:
Dallas (+462,639)
Houston (+360,649)
Phoenix (+219,008)
Atlanta (+200,414)
Austin (+189,896)
Tampa (+167,672)
San Antonio (+145,884)
Charlotte (+144,767)
Orlando (+144,542)
Jacksonville (+107,396)
The only city that shows up on both is Houston.
What this suggests is that cities very much have brands. And when you ask people where they'd ideally like to live, they think of the sexiest ones. Places like New York, Miami, Los Angeles, and so on. But it when it comes to actually moving somewhere and paying for a home, there are clearly other realities to consider -- the most important of which is probably affordability.
Last year, I wrote about how Salt Lake City wants to build a new linear park around its downtown. That post can be found, here.
Fast forward to today, and the city's Department of Economic Development has just published a new comprehensive 215-page study that supports turning Main Street into a pedestrian promenade.
Specifically, the area running from South Temple to 400 South, and including 100 South from Main to West Temple:
I had a dinner in the suburbs this evening. And so in the afternoon today, I opened up Google Maps to figure out how I was going to get there.
I didn’t have my car with me — because I hate driving into the office — so in my mind, I was either going to take transit or take an Uber.
These are the time estimates that Google gave me:
As part of the study, they highlight a number of successful case studies from around the world, including 16th Street Mall in Denver, Bourke Street Mall in Melbourne, and Queens Quay here in Toronto.
In the case of Denver, they cite the one-mile stretch as single-handedly generating over 40% of the city's total downtown tax revenue! And in the case of Toronto, they refer to Queens Quay as a global destination. (Toronto readers, do you agree?)
Like most city building initiatives, this vision is will take years to realize. But it's interesting to note that, of the eight design alternatives included in the study, there is already one clear preference within the local community -- option B.
Option B is a pedestrian/transit mall, but with multi-use trails. In other words, it is a no-cars-allowed alternative that would still allow bicycles and scooters. Here's the street section:
If you'd like to download a copy of the full Main Street Pedestrian Promenade Study, click here.
It was going to take me over 4 hours to walk there. Over an hour to drive there. And 47 minutes to take the train there. Interestingly enough, cycling was also going to be faster than driving.
As soon as I saw this, I shut down the app and decided I would take the train. All I was interested in was the absolute fastest option. And for me at that moment, it was the train.
I recognize that this isn’t always the case. Sometimes driving is much faster than taking transit. It depends on a number of factors.
But as a general rule, when it comes to big and dense cities, you really can’t beat trains and bikes for moving the greatest number of people, as quickly as possible.
