I am not convinced that autonomous vehicles will make “location” irrelevant.
But I do agree with the following line from this recent Bloomberg article called, A Driverless Future Threatens the Laws of Real Estate.
“The link between property and transport has been perhaps the most durable in human history.”
So this remark by David Silver could very well be correct:
“Real estate might be the industry that is most transformed by autonomous vehicles.”
Technological advances in mobility have historically brought about decentralization because each advance – from streetcars to the automobile – made it reasonable to travel further distances.
Of course, autonomous vehicles are also expected to free up our time and focus while in transit – although trains do that for us today albeit with that pesky last mile problem.
But just like the internet in the late 90′s didn’t make location irrelevant (the opposite appears to have happened), I am similarly unconvinced when it comes to autonomous vehicles. What we consider a desirable location may simply shift.
So this is not to say that the won’t see profound change in our cities. We will. Which is why we’re all trying to get ahead of it.
FiveThirtyEight (Jed Kolko) published a post last month called, “Americans’ Shift To The Suburbs Sped Up Last year.”
What Kolko did was take recent population estimates from the US Census Bureau and group them into 6 categories based on the size of the metro and its population density.
By doing this he discovered something that runs counter to the narrative that we are living through an urban renaissance: lower-density suburbs grew faster than urban counties. The former grew at ~1.3% in 2016. And in the south and west, the lower-density suburbs of large metro areas topped over 2% growth.
What gives?
Well, this urban renaissance is lopsided. Here’s an excerpt from the article:
That revival is real, but it has mostly been for rich, educated people in particular hyperurban neighborhoods rather than a broad-based return to city living. To be sure, college-educated millennials — at least those without school-age kids — took to the city, and better-paying jobs have shifted there, too. But other groups — older adults, families with kids in school, and people of all ages with lower incomes — either can’t afford or don’t want an urban address.
Richard Florida is calling this phenomenon: The New Urban Crisis.
Back in 2015, I was interviewed for a documentary called The Millennial Dream. I then completely forgot about it until somebody tweeted it at me yesterday. So the documentary is out – it was released last year – and you can rent it or buy it on iTunes.
The documentary calls into question the [North] American Dream. This idea that you just have to work hard, save up, buy a house in the suburbs, pay off your debt, and then everything will be just fine. For many, that dream is quickly disappearing, if it hasn’t already.
Enter the Millennial Dream. Our economy is changing. Our jobs are changing. Our cities are changing. And by 2020, the Millennial generation is expected to form 50% of the global workforce. What is this generation dreaming about? That is what this documentary is about.
But I should probably stop here because I haven’t actually seen the film. I could be overselling it. I’ll watch it this weekend and then report back. If you can’t see the trailer embedded below, click here.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVCNXJk2fT8&w=560&h=315]