Some buildings should be torn down. And others should not be. The challenge, sometimes, is figuring out which is which. But when a great building is torn down, I get upset. 

I get upset because good architecture should represent the place and era in which it was built. This means that, in a lot of cases, it’ll never be replicated. When it’s gone, it’s gone.

Take for example the old Penn Station in New York City. Designed by renowned architectural firm McKim, Mead, and White, the station opened in 1910 and was an iconic Beaux-Arts structure. Here’s an historic photo:

In 1963 the building was demolished. It was eventually replaced with a building that, I think most people today would agree, is quite awful. And while it did teach New York City a lesson about historic preservation, the loss still sucks.

Ultimately I think that preservation is about balance. I’m obviously pro-development but, at the same time, I don’t believe in erasing our history.

Last Monday, the Office of the New York Attorney General subpoenaed Airbnb for information about all of its 15,000 “landlords” who rent out spaces in New York through their service. Airbnb has since refused to provide the information.

This is an interesting case. Airbnb is one of those startups that seemed initially like an idea too crazy to work, but has since grown to become a serious disruption to the hotel industry. However, the problem is that many jurisdictions have laws pertaining to illegal hotels. In the case of New York, the law prohibits short-term rentals under 30 days unless the permanent resident is present alongside the guest(s).

What this means is that renting out your apartment while you’re away for the weekend-which from my experience here in Toronto is how a lot of people use the service-is technically illegal in New York. State senator, Liz Krueger, believes that apartment building residents shouldn’t have to worry that their neighbouring apartment could turn into a de facto hotel room.

While I do sympathize with this concern, I think there’s a gradient of use here. Not every Airbnb user is operating a de facto hotel. Many, whatever that percentage might be, simply use it to earn extra income while their place sits idle. And to do this, the permanent resident is trusting their home to a stranger.

So in a way, there’s a filter in place that isn’t there when the unit is being operated strictly as a hotel suite. Therefore, maybe we just need to expand the definition of having a “permanent resident present” to include having their belongings and life in the place.

It’ll be interesting to see how this all pans out. But whatever the result, it’s clear that Airbnb is definitely shaking up the status quo. Do you think residents should be freely allowed to rent out their places on any term?

According to a recent report called Building a Digital City, which I found via Fred Wilson’s blog, tech is now the second largest job sector in New York City behind financial services (which includes real estate). There are an estimated 262,000 tech workers in the city earning wages in excess of $30 billion.

This is a really interesting stat that speaks to the diversity of New York’s economy and the ability for it to continually reinvent itself. But what I found particularly interesting, was the following comment by Fred Wilson:

“And the reason tech is growing so fast in NYC is that it is embedding itself in all of these other industries. It’s not entirely clear to me whether Gilt is a tech company or a fashion/retail company, it is not clear to me whether ZocDoc is a tech company or a health care company, it is not clear to me whether Codecademy is a tech company or an education company.”

This is very much the way I think about so called tech companies today. I recently had a Rotman colleague say to me that he felt the startup world was becoming saturated. Everyone is now seemingly working on some new app.

But I like to think of it slightly differently. As Fred’s comment above suggests, a lot of startups today aren’t purely tech companies. They’re just out to solve a problem and it just so happens that technology and the internet are creating all sorts of opportunities for new solutions.

I also read a blog called Platform Connected and the author put it like this:

“In the future, every company will be a tech company. We already see this change around us as companies move to restructure their business models in a way that uses data to create value. We are moving from linear to networked business models, from dumb pipes to intelligent platforms. All businesses will need to move to this new model at some point, or risk being disrupted by platforms that do.”

So there you have it. Software really is eating the world.