About Here makes excellent videos about cities. Here's their latest about missing middle housing:

In my view, there are two key takeaways.

The first is that cities need to spend way more time understanding the economics of missing middle housing. As Uytae Lee says in the video, our land use policies need to respond to real math and overall financial viability.

The second is that there's real potential here. Uytae gives the example of Auckland which, according to the video, managed to deliver 20,000 new missing middle homes in a 5-year time period.

This is meaningful! And, it is suggested that this has reduced rents in the city by somewhere between 13-35% compared to where they might have gone had this new housing not been built.

As I've said many times before on the blog, the devil is in the details. The headline may sound really great that some city is now allowing 4 or 6 homes on every single-family lot, but that doesn't necessarily mean that any new homes will actually be built.

It's important we change that.

P.S. Thanks to Michael Geller for sharing this video with me.

We talk a lot about "missing middle" housing on this blog and, most recently, we've been talking about Toronto's proposed amendments to allow fourplexes across the city and to do away with density maximums (among other things).

Well, it's now time to make a decision. These proposed changes are headed to Planning and Housing Committee on Thursday, April 27th. If you'd like to attend in person or virtually, here's a copy of the public meeting notice.

The other option is to make a written submission. The good people over at "More Neighbours Toronto" have created this website which will allow you to quickly write the Committee.

There's an auto-generated response in support of legalizing multiplex housing -- and that's what I used for my boring email submission -- but, of course, you're free to edit the text as you'd like.

If you check the agenda, you'll see that there are already hundreds of email submissions in to the Committee, many of them coming from More Neighbours. Clearly this is a topic that, one way or the other, many people feel very strongly about.

Click here to make an email submission.

The City of Victoria, BC did a good thing last week: It passed its "Missing Middle Housing Initiative", which means that up 6 dwelling units (their language not mine) will soon be permissible on every single-family lot in the city, and up to 12 dwelling units will be permissible in "corner townhouses". These land uses changes come into effect on Sunday, March 12, 2023 (45 days after adoption).

Here on the blog, we've been talking about this shift toward intensifying our single-family neighborhoods for many years. And momentum clearly continues to grow. At face value, this appears to be one of the more enlightened moves by a city: 6 homes and 12 homes. Though these headline numbers may have something to do with the average lot sizes in Victoria. Either way, the devil is in the details. And here are some of those details:

What is positive to see is that a number of other zoning requirements have been updated. Because it's not enough to just say, "Hey, we're going to allow more homes on each lot. There, we've done something. Developers, go and do that." Here, the allowable height has been increased, setbacks have been decreased, and the floor space ratio (site density) has been increased from 0.5 to 1.1 (assuming you do at least one amenity contribution).

I don't know if this is exactly right and if it's everything that developers will need in order to start building a lot more missing middle housing in Victoria. (If you're a local developer, please let me know in the comment section below.) But I think it's certainly a step in the right direction.

About Here makes excellent videos about cities. Here's their latest about missing middle housing:

In my view, there are two key takeaways.

The first is that cities need to spend way more time understanding the economics of missing middle housing. As Uytae Lee says in the video, our land use policies need to respond to real math and overall financial viability.

The second is that there's real potential here. Uytae gives the example of Auckland which, according to the video, managed to deliver 20,000 new missing middle homes in a 5-year time period.

This is meaningful! And, it is suggested that this has reduced rents in the city by somewhere between 13-35% compared to where they might have gone had this new housing not been built.

As I've said many times before on the blog, the devil is in the details. The headline may sound really great that some city is now allowing 4 or 6 homes on every single-family lot, but that doesn't necessarily mean that any new homes will actually be built.

It's important we change that.

P.S. Thanks to Michael Geller for sharing this video with me.

We talk a lot about "missing middle" housing on this blog and, most recently, we've been talking about Toronto's proposed amendments to allow fourplexes across the city and to do away with density maximums (among other things).

Well, it's now time to make a decision. These proposed changes are headed to Planning and Housing Committee on Thursday, April 27th. If you'd like to attend in person or virtually, here's a copy of the public meeting notice.

The other option is to make a written submission. The good people over at "More Neighbours Toronto" have created this website which will allow you to quickly write the Committee.

There's an auto-generated response in support of legalizing multiplex housing -- and that's what I used for my boring email submission -- but, of course, you're free to edit the text as you'd like.

If you check the agenda, you'll see that there are already hundreds of email submissions in to the Committee, many of them coming from More Neighbours. Clearly this is a topic that, one way or the other, many people feel very strongly about.

Click here to make an email submission.

The City of Victoria, BC did a good thing last week: It passed its "Missing Middle Housing Initiative", which means that up 6 dwelling units (their language not mine) will soon be permissible on every single-family lot in the city, and up to 12 dwelling units will be permissible in "corner townhouses". These land uses changes come into effect on Sunday, March 12, 2023 (45 days after adoption).

Here on the blog, we've been talking about this shift toward intensifying our single-family neighborhoods for many years. And momentum clearly continues to grow. At face value, this appears to be one of the more enlightened moves by a city: 6 homes and 12 homes. Though these headline numbers may have something to do with the average lot sizes in Victoria. Either way, the devil is in the details. And here are some of those details:

What is positive to see is that a number of other zoning requirements have been updated. Because it's not enough to just say, "Hey, we're going to allow more homes on each lot. There, we've done something. Developers, go and do that." Here, the allowable height has been increased, setbacks have been decreased, and the floor space ratio (site density) has been increased from 0.5 to 1.1 (assuming you do at least one amenity contribution).

I don't know if this is exactly right and if it's everything that developers will need in order to start building a lot more missing middle housing in Victoria. (If you're a local developer, please let me know in the comment section below.) But I think it's certainly a step in the right direction.