The European Union uses something called the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (or NUTS) in order to geographically subdivide its member states and collect statistical data. There are three scales: NUTS 1, 2, and 3. And generally speaking, they follow existing administrative boundaries. Or at least that's the goal.

In addition to being used for collecting statistical data, they also form the basis for how the EU implements its "cohesion policies", which are designed to direct funds toward less developed regions within the Union based on GDP per capita (PPP).

Because these NUTS impact funding allocations and because they can be redrawn if certain criteria are met, there's not surprisingly an incentive to gerrymander. The Pudding has a great visual essay that explains why this happens and how Hungary split its central region into two new ones, isolating its capital, Budapest.

Big cities tend to be, of course, more developed than their surrounding areas. But it is interesting to see by how much. Though an extreme outlier, the Inner London - West region has a GDP per capita that is 625% the EU average (2017 numbers).

Image: The Pudding

The United Nations recently released its 2015 version of World Population Prospects. It looks as if they put out and revise this report every 5 years.

The Economist then took some of their data and assembled it into the following charts:

It’s obviously extremely difficult to predict what will happen in the world by 2100, but to the extent that forecasting is possible, the world’s population is expected to reach somewhere around 11.2 billion people. Today it’s 7.3 billion.

The bulk of this growth is expected to happen first in Africa, and then in Asia. By 2100, Africa’s share of the global population is expected to grow to 39% and Asia’s share is expected to decline to 44%.

If you’ve been following population trends, most of this shouldn’t come as a surprise to you. The meaningful population growth happening in the world today is happening in the developing world. 

That’s why architects, such as Rem Koolhaas, have been studying cities like Lagos (Nigeria) since the late 1990s and early 2000s. Below is a photo from a book/research project that I love called Mutations (2000). I pulled it from my bookshelf this morning.

It’s interesting to think about what all of this will mean for the global economy and for global governance. 

The United States is about to be alone when it comes to advanced economies with a globally competitive population. Europe is shrinking, which leads me to believe that a strong EU is likely important. And we now have lots of megalopolises with big populations, but with very low income levels.

Nigeria is the largest economy in Africa, but per capita income is somewhere around $3,000.

The European Union uses something called the Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (or NUTS) in order to geographically subdivide its member states and collect statistical data. There are three scales: NUTS 1, 2, and 3. And generally speaking, they follow existing administrative boundaries. Or at least that's the goal.

In addition to being used for collecting statistical data, they also form the basis for how the EU implements its "cohesion policies", which are designed to direct funds toward less developed regions within the Union based on GDP per capita (PPP).

Because these NUTS impact funding allocations and because they can be redrawn if certain criteria are met, there's not surprisingly an incentive to gerrymander. The Pudding has a great visual essay that explains why this happens and how Hungary split its central region into two new ones, isolating its capital, Budapest.

Big cities tend to be, of course, more developed than their surrounding areas. But it is interesting to see by how much. Though an extreme outlier, the Inner London - West region has a GDP per capita that is 625% the EU average (2017 numbers).

Image: The Pudding

The United Nations recently released its 2015 version of World Population Prospects. It looks as if they put out and revise this report every 5 years.

The Economist then took some of their data and assembled it into the following charts:

It’s obviously extremely difficult to predict what will happen in the world by 2100, but to the extent that forecasting is possible, the world’s population is expected to reach somewhere around 11.2 billion people. Today it’s 7.3 billion.

The bulk of this growth is expected to happen first in Africa, and then in Asia. By 2100, Africa’s share of the global population is expected to grow to 39% and Asia’s share is expected to decline to 44%.

If you’ve been following population trends, most of this shouldn’t come as a surprise to you. The meaningful population growth happening in the world today is happening in the developing world. 

That’s why architects, such as Rem Koolhaas, have been studying cities like Lagos (Nigeria) since the late 1990s and early 2000s. Below is a photo from a book/research project that I love called Mutations (2000). I pulled it from my bookshelf this morning.

It’s interesting to think about what all of this will mean for the global economy and for global governance. 

The United States is about to be alone when it comes to advanced economies with a globally competitive population. Europe is shrinking, which leads me to believe that a strong EU is likely important. And we now have lots of megalopolises with big populations, but with very low income levels.

Nigeria is the largest economy in Africa, but per capita income is somewhere around $3,000.