Join >4.5k subscribers and stay updated by getting the latest posts delivered directly to your inbox.
One of the most popular blog posts that I have ever written on this blog over the last 12 years is this one: Canada must become a global superpower. And in this post, I argue that Canada needs to create a sovereign wealth fund, and that we have Norway to look to as a model. This is a topic that is raised semi-frequently in Canada. Just this past week, John Ruffolo, who is the Founder and Managing Partner of Maverix Private Equity, published this opinion piece in the Globe and Mail. Here's an excerpt:
Aging demographics, high taxes, deficits and unproductive wealth trapped in housing mean we simply don’t generate large capital pools for productive assets. Our pension funds, though world-class in size and governance, largely bypass Canadian innovators in favour of global opportunities. Our venture and private equity funds rely heavily on U.S. investors. Our banks, stable by design, avoid the kind of long-term risk capital required to build sovereign industries.
A sovereign wealth fund is not a slush fund. Done properly, it is a professionally managed pool of assets, governed independently, with two purposes: strengthen [Canada] sovereignty and generate long-term returns.
Canada has never had a true national sovereign wealth fund similar to what Norway, Singapore and others have done. That is, we don't have a federal-level, state-owned investment fund built from natural resource surpluses, trade surpluses, or foreign exchange reserves. What we have instead is a provincial SWF called the Alberta Heritage Savings Trust Fund (AHSTF).
Many Albertans will be quick to point out that the province's non-renewable resource revenues should remain that of the province. But let's be clear: this fund has not done what it set out to do. It has failed due to political interference and a governance structure that does not promote long-term thinking.
Established in 1976 with an initial capital contribution of CAD 1.5 billion, the annual share of non-renewable resource revenues to be contributed was initially set at 30%. This was later reduced to 15%, and then in 1987, mandatory annual contributions were eliminated, making it more of an ad hoc thing. On top of this, over CAD 33 billion has been withdrawn from the fund over its life for various expenditures. The result is current assets under management of approximately CAD 30 billion.
To put this AUM into perspective, if the AHSTF had instead taken its initial contribution of CAD 1.5 billion, invested it into the S&P 500 in 1976, and then sat on its ass for the next half decade doing absolutely nothing besides keeping the fund active, it would today have a value of approximately CAD 160 billion (assuming an average annual return of 10% with dividends reinvested).
Now let's compare it to the Norway Government Pension Fund Global (their oil fund). This fund only received its initial capital contribution of ~USD 240 billion in 1996. But unlike Alberta, 100% of oil and gas revenues are contributed, there have never been any withdrawals, and governance is not political — it's independent and legally protected. The result is current assets under management of approximately USD 2 trillion, making it the world's largest sovereign wealth fund.
For fun, I asked AI to come up with an assets under management estimate for a Canadian Sovereign Wealth Fund had it been established in 1976 with the same CAD 1.5 billion initial contribution; had we made annual oil & gas revenue contributions ranging from $5 to $15 billion; had we achieved an annual return of 6% (like Norway); and had we never done any withdrawals due to strong governance and political independence.
The result is an AUM range between CAD 1.5 trillion and 4.4 trillion. In other words, Canada could, today, be sitting on the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world. But you know what the next best thing to this is? Starting one today.
Cover photo by Hermes Rivera on Unsplash
New World Wind is a French company that makes something known as wind trees. These are trees that come in a few different models and produce renewable energy using 36 micro-turbines shaped like leaves (their Aeroleaf technology). There is also the option of supplementing these turbines with solar panels.
According to New World Wind, one wind tree can produce enough electricity to cover 80% of a typical French households' annual consumption needs (excluding heating) or about 100 m2 of office space. And on top of this, for every wind tree, the company goes out and plants 10 real ones.
Here's a video of one of their trees being installed outside of a factory in Taiwan:
I think these are pretty neat. And already, they have been installed all around the world. But unfortunately, there has yet to be one installed in Canada. That should change, so maybe one of you will consider installing a wind tree at one of your projects.
I've already reached out for more information so that we can consider doing the same.
Cover photo via New World Wind
Over the weekend, Warren Buffett and his team hosted some 40,000 people in Omaha for Berkshire Hathaway's annual shareholder meeting. And during the event the 94-year-old announced that he would be retiring at the end of the year. This is after 55 years as CEO, which makes him the longest-serving chief executive of an S&P 500 company.
What a run. Thanks for all the wisdom that you have shared over the years, Warren. In honor of this milestone, I decided to go back and reread his last shareholder letter (which was published back in February). His comments on the insurance industry are particularly interesting, and naturally relevant to real estate.
Over the decades, Warren has talked a lot about the benefits of owning insurance companies, namely the "money-up-front, loss-payments-later" model. It creates a "float" of cash that can be invested in the interim. But the flip side of this benefit is that it can sometimes conceal a shitty business.
As a business, if you have to pay your costs up front before you sell your products or services, then it's pretty easy to determine if you're not making any money. But in insurance, there's a long-tail of liabilities that can be far more insidious and that may not appear for many years, or even decades according to Warren.
There's also climate change bringing more uncertainty:
In general, property-casualty (“P/C”) insurance pricing strengthened during 2024, reflecting a major increase in damage from convective storms. Climate change may have been announcing its arrival. However, no “monster” event occurred during 2024. Someday, any day, a truly staggering insurance loss will occur – and there is no guarantee that there will be only one per annum.
Think back only 135 years when the world had no autos, trucks or airplanes. Now there are 300 million vehicles in the U.S. alone, a massive fleet causing huge damage daily. Property damage arising from hurricanes, tornadoes and wildfires is massive, growing and increasingly unpredictable in their patterns and eventual costs.
In a perverse way, all of this is good for the insurance business. More economic risk means higher premiums and a greater overall need for insurance products. But you have to accurately underwrite this risk:
Properly pricing P/C insurance is part art, part science and is definitely not a business for optimists. Mike Goldberg, the Berkshire executive who recruited Ajit, said it best: “We want our underwriters to daily come to work nervous, but not paralyzed.”
This reminds me. I was speaking with one of our insurance advisors a few years ago and he made a comment that he was going to be "on risk for the project." I responded by half-jokingly saying "it's funny, you see only risk, and I see an opportunity to create something special for the city." Both of us then laughed, but there's obviously some truth to these two perspectives.
I guess I chose the right profession.
Cover photo by Chris Nguyen on Unsplash
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
