| 1. | 0xdb8f...bcfd | 4.5M |
| 2. | jcandqc | 4.1M |
| 3. | baldinini | 941K |
| 4. | partytime | 939K |
| 5. | jimmyyyy | 918.6K |
| 6. | witcher01 | 898.8K |
| 7. | kualta.eth | 869.1K |
| 8. | Brandon Donnelly | 702.4K |
| 9. | ZORG | 487.3K |
| 10. | Ev Tchebotarev | 170.5K |
Matt Daniels over at The Pudding recently visualized the world’s population in this spiky 3D map. You need to take a look. Better on desktop.
The data is from 2015, but you can also compare it to and show the change from 1990.
Here is the Greater Toronto and Hamilton region (16.8 million people reside in this screen grab):
Here is the New York City region (55.4 million people reside in this screen grab):
And here is China (1.054 billion people reside in this screen grab):
I tried to capture both Shanghai and Hong Kong in this image. Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Shenzhen are currently in the mist of forming a 40 million-person megalopolis.
If we pan back over to the northeastern United States and Central Canada – keeping the same scale as the above image from China – it looks like this:
These last two images say a lot.
Last week, Lyft announced a new subscription plan.
It costs $299 every 30 days and you get 30 rides included (up to $15 each). So it represents a possible 1/3 discount on rides. If you go over the 30 rides per month or over $15 on any one ride, you simply pay the difference. Though as a subscriber, you get 5% off additional rides.
Subscriptions are good for business. They can be like an annuity. And I suspect that with the above model, there will be unutilized rides every month that the company is just able to bank. You can’t carryover rides with this plan.
But moreover, Lyft’s “All-Access Plan” is designed to help you ditch your car. Trade your car payment for a ride subscription plan. So if the numbers didn’t quite work for you before, maybe they do now. Depending on the situation, I can certainly see this plan being cost effective.
But as ride hailing/sharing continues to nibble away at public transportation and personal vehicle ownership, what will this mean for cities?
BIG just announced its first project in South America. It is a 33 storey residential building in Quito, Ecuador. When completed, it will be the tallest building in the city. The developer is Uribe and Schwarzkopf.
Here are a couple of other images:
The building is made up of “concrete boxes” that, when rotated, create terraces for the apartments. On one corner of the building the apartments are “through-units”, meaning they have two exposures. In this case, it is north and south.
While different, we are starting to see some similarities across BIG’s projects, which isn’t meant as a criticism. I am thinking of Telus Sky, Vancouver House, and even KING Toronto.
They are, at least partially, about expressing the individual apartments and creating opportunities for outdoor spaces. This also serves to break down the overall scale of the building.
What do you think of the project?
Images: BIG
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
