Brandon Donnelly
Daily insights for city builders. Published since 2013 by Toronto-based real estate developer Brandon Donnelly.
Brandon Donnelly
Daily insights for city builders. Published since 2013 by Toronto-based real estate developer Brandon Donnelly.
One of the big housing stories of this year was that Austin has built a lot of new apartments and it is now causing rents to fall precipitously — by as much as 22%. The market is working.
But as we also talk about on this blog, the benefits of new "luxury" housing don't just apply to those who can afford it. Since real estate development happens on the margin — in other words, it's based on the feasibility of the next unit of housing supply, not an average for the market — new market-rate housing typically needs to cater to the top end of the market. Otherwise, it wouldn't be economically feasible to build it.
However, study after study also shows that the delivery of any new housing in a city broadly tempers rents, including in a city's oldest housing stock. This is true in virtually all cities:
The above chart is from this recent Bloomberg article, talking about how "luxury apartments are bringing rents down." But if you look closely, there is one city on this chart that appears to be an outlier: Miami.
Despite adding a respectable number of homes, rents have not fallen as much as you might expect given the figures for the other cities on this list. The intuitive explanation is likely that Miami is in the midst of experiencing an extraordinary wealth transfer.
For the five-year period through to 2022, it was estimated that some 30,000 New Yorkers with combined annual incomes of $9.2 billion moved to Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties. It's also an important capital safe haven for Latin America.
I vividly remember looking at condo listings in Miami in 2008 and thinking, "Damn, this is cheap!" I even tried to find a job there after grad school, but at that time, it was no place for a new real estate developer. My best bet would have been something in loan workouts.
Who could have predicted such an incredible transformation? It isn't the third most important global city in the US according to the numbers, but it certainly has a lot of momentum right now. In this instance, new supply does not appear to be more than offsetting demand.
Cover photo by Valeriia Neganova on Unsplash
Aaron Gordon, who is a data reporter at Bloomberg News, has been working on his coding skills. And so for absolutely no reason whatsoever, he decided to map out the life of one of New York's Citi Bikes, specifically Citi Bike #32606. The dataset is pre-pandemic because Citi Bike stopped publishing unique bike identifiers for each trip around 2020. But based on historical data and far as we know, #32606 is the most-used traditional bike (i.e. not an e-bike) in the history of the Citi Bike network.
It began its life on October 15, 2017 at 11:08am in Park Slope, Brooklyn, and then went on to accomplish 7,060 miles (~11,361 kilometers) and 8,624 trips over a period of 806 days. This works out to an average of just over 10 trips per day. In total, this bike traveled the equivalent of a return trip from New York to Los Angeles, and then a short trip up to Burlington, Vermont. And it was all done with only leg power.
Here's the visual mapping that Aaron created:
What I love about this passion project is that it starts to show just how impactful something as simple as a single shared bicycle can be for a city. These bike networks are relatively new, but they're already doing a lot of heavy lifting when it comes to urban mobility. Earlier this week, we learned that in the City of London, cyclists now make up 2x the number of people in cars. And that of the people cycling, 17% of them do so using a shared bicycle.
In the case of New York, the Citi Bike network had ~128,000 active members and
One of the big housing stories of this year was that Austin has built a lot of new apartments and it is now causing rents to fall precipitously — by as much as 22%. The market is working.
But as we also talk about on this blog, the benefits of new "luxury" housing don't just apply to those who can afford it. Since real estate development happens on the margin — in other words, it's based on the feasibility of the next unit of housing supply, not an average for the market — new market-rate housing typically needs to cater to the top end of the market. Otherwise, it wouldn't be economically feasible to build it.
However, study after study also shows that the delivery of any new housing in a city broadly tempers rents, including in a city's oldest housing stock. This is true in virtually all cities:
The above chart is from this recent Bloomberg article, talking about how "luxury apartments are bringing rents down." But if you look closely, there is one city on this chart that appears to be an outlier: Miami.
Despite adding a respectable number of homes, rents have not fallen as much as you might expect given the figures for the other cities on this list. The intuitive explanation is likely that Miami is in the midst of experiencing an extraordinary wealth transfer.
For the five-year period through to 2022, it was estimated that some 30,000 New Yorkers with combined annual incomes of $9.2 billion moved to Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties. It's also an important capital safe haven for Latin America.
I vividly remember looking at condo listings in Miami in 2008 and thinking, "Damn, this is cheap!" I even tried to find a job there after grad school, but at that time, it was no place for a new real estate developer. My best bet would have been something in loan workouts.
Who could have predicted such an incredible transformation? It isn't the third most important global city in the US according to the numbers, but it certainly has a lot of momentum right now. In this instance, new supply does not appear to be more than offsetting demand.
Cover photo by Valeriia Neganova on Unsplash
Aaron Gordon, who is a data reporter at Bloomberg News, has been working on his coding skills. And so for absolutely no reason whatsoever, he decided to map out the life of one of New York's Citi Bikes, specifically Citi Bike #32606. The dataset is pre-pandemic because Citi Bike stopped publishing unique bike identifiers for each trip around 2020. But based on historical data and far as we know, #32606 is the most-used traditional bike (i.e. not an e-bike) in the history of the Citi Bike network.
It began its life on October 15, 2017 at 11:08am in Park Slope, Brooklyn, and then went on to accomplish 7,060 miles (~11,361 kilometers) and 8,624 trips over a period of 806 days. This works out to an average of just over 10 trips per day. In total, this bike traveled the equivalent of a return trip from New York to Los Angeles, and then a short trip up to Burlington, Vermont. And it was all done with only leg power.
Here's the visual mapping that Aaron created:
What I love about this passion project is that it starts to show just how impactful something as simple as a single shared bicycle can be for a city. These bike networks are relatively new, but they're already doing a lot of heavy lifting when it comes to urban mobility. Earlier this week, we learned that in the City of London, cyclists now make up 2x the number of people in cars. And that of the people cycling, 17% of them do so using a shared bicycle.
In the case of New York, the Citi Bike network had ~128,000 active members and
Nationwide across the US, transit ridership is only at about 70% of where it was in 2019 before the pandemic. But this is not the case in all cities around the world. According to this recent Bloomberg article, Madrid, Hong Kong, and Paris are all above their 2019 ridership levels. Seoul and Shanghai are also close at just over 90%, and London is at 85%.
So this problem of fewer people riding transit seems to be a North and South American phenomenon. Rio de Janeiro is at 73%, Mexico City is at 70%, and San Francisco is somewhere near or at the bottom at 44%. The obvious explanations for this are that Europe and Asia are generally denser and less car-oriented, their return-to-office patterns have been much stronger (less WFH), and their governments probably care more about transit (and spend more money on it).
Broadly speaking, I think this is all true, but I'd love to know more precisely what's driving these differences. Because it's not exactly obvious. Consider, for example, Paris and London. Paris is at 103% of its 2019 levels, whereas London is only at 85%. Why is that? Both cities share a lot of similarities. They have a river that weaves through the middle, they're dense, they have lots of trains, and both are alpha global cities.
So why the delta? What exactly is Paris doing that is encouraging more transit usage?
Charts via Bloomberg
Cover photo by Spenser Sembrat on Unsplash
Nationwide across the US, transit ridership is only at about 70% of where it was in 2019 before the pandemic. But this is not the case in all cities around the world. According to this recent Bloomberg article, Madrid, Hong Kong, and Paris are all above their 2019 ridership levels. Seoul and Shanghai are also close at just over 90%, and London is at 85%.
So this problem of fewer people riding transit seems to be a North and South American phenomenon. Rio de Janeiro is at 73%, Mexico City is at 70%, and San Francisco is somewhere near or at the bottom at 44%. The obvious explanations for this are that Europe and Asia are generally denser and less car-oriented, their return-to-office patterns have been much stronger (less WFH), and their governments probably care more about transit (and spend more money on it).
Broadly speaking, I think this is all true, but I'd love to know more precisely what's driving these differences. Because it's not exactly obvious. Consider, for example, Paris and London. Paris is at 103% of its 2019 levels, whereas London is only at 85%. Why is that? Both cities share a lot of similarities. They have a river that weaves through the middle, they're dense, they have lots of trains, and both are alpha global cities.
So why the delta? What exactly is Paris doing that is encouraging more transit usage?
Charts via Bloomberg
Cover photo by Spenser Sembrat on Unsplash
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
