Daily insights for city builders, delivered every morning at 6 AM ET. I’m Brandon Donnelly — a Toronto-based real estate developer and founder of Globizen. I’ve been writing here since 2013.

Tag: uber

  • The great bifurcation: Machine-centred vs. human-centred real estate

    “When you fall in love again, you don’t think about the ex very much.” —Travis Kalanick, co-founder of Uber, talking about how he feels about Uber today

    You’d be forgiven for thinking that Travis Kalanick, co-founder of Uber, is back. Since leaving Uber heartbroken in 2017, he has been relatively quiet. But in his words, “I’ve been working my ass off the whole time. I just haven’t been talking about it.” Clearly. Last month, he announced that his startup Atoms had just raised $1.7 billion in equity. The round was led by venture firm a16z.

    Atoms is an audacious business and I would encourage you to check out their website and read their vision. Travis describes his life’s work as “digitizing the physical world” and Atoms’ mission is “physical automation to transform industry and move the world.”

    What that means — and what’s fascinating for us real estate people — is that he’s creating a physical AI company that uses single-purpose machines (as opposed to general-purpose humanoids like what Tesla has been promising for a number of years) to automate specialized tasks such as food preparation, resource extraction, and transport.

    However, all of these “atoms” need to be stored and processed somewhere, and so Travis views land and real estate as a critical resource in the world of physical AI. He goes on to argue that real estate development is a “dramatically underappreciated” ingredient. Everyone in tech has been too focused on software. And he means it. I took a look at their careers section and they have dozens of real estate-related job postings across the world.

    The hope with all of this is a new Golden Age:

    “Everything in our world, in our cities, in our civilization – look around you – is mined or grown – manufactured and moved. The next Golden Age will be upon us when the means of growing, mining, manufacturing and moving physical things becomes fully divorced from human labor.”

    When you consider this vision and our current data centre boom, it’s not hard to imagine the potential impacts on our built environment. Our cities are bifurcating into two broad forms of real estate: machine-centred and human-centred real estate.

    The machine-centred assets might service our online lives or the physical world, as is the case with Atoms, but they won’t necessarily need to engage with their broader environment or have things like windows, climate control, and even lights. They are “black boxes” for machines.

    Human-centred assets are, on the other hand, the sort of spaces that we talk about on this blog: walkable, human-scaled communities where people genuinely want to live, work and play. This, in my view, is the divide we are headed toward and it’s going to mean a reconfiguration of our urban areas and a repricing of real estate assets.

    Intuitively, I think this will only enhance the value of human-centred assets. We are going to want what is scarce: authentic human connections, beautiful architecture, and differentiated people-first experiences.

  • Who actually wins the autonomous vehicle future?

    There was once a time when Uber was heavily investing in autonomous vehicles and rides. Then that stopped in an effort to become profitable. But now, out of necessity, it’s back. Uber recently announced that the company will invest “$10 billion of capital over the coming years to bring AVs to market at scale.”

    Uber’s belief is that the self-driving car industry won’t be dominated by just one company. Instead, it will be a mixed ecosystem where some companies build their own cars and ride-hailing apps, and others plug into existing networks. And in this world, it is these networks — like Uber — that will become the most valuable piece of the puzzle.

    Perhaps.

    Whether they believe this or not, Uber basically has to say this because they are the platform aggregator. They do not build or operate any self-driving vehicles of their own — at least not anymore. These parts of their business were sold off.

    Autonomous vehicles are a wicked technical challenge. The edge cases are extraordinarily difficult to solve. If only a select few companies solve them, and solve them well, then there’s an argument to be made that they will capture the majority of the market.

    But if AV technology becomes commoditized and it ends up being all about the brand and who can aggregate demand the best, well then, Uber could very well be right. They already have global scale.

    My view is that Waymo has such a commanding lead when it comes to AVs that they have the leverage in the short and medium term. There are also zero switching costs for ride-hailing customers. I’ll use whatever is better. So if I’m Uber, I’m worried about Waymo, which is presumably why they are starting to have differing opinions.