Tag: high park

• The investment case for mid-rise condos

  Shane Dingman’s recent Globe and Mail article about “the investment case for mid-rise condos” is a good summary of why this housing type has become so popular in Toronto.

  Mid-rise buildings tend to attract more end-users because of their boutique scale. That is, they attract people who plan to move into the building once it is built, as opposed to buyers who plan to rent out their unit. We are certainly seeing this with purchasers at Junction House.

  Because of their generally smaller scale and because they are often built in mature neighborhoods with few opportunities for new construction, supply of new mid-rise housing also tends to be limited. That bodes well for future price appreciation.

  Here’s a quote from Shaun Hildebrand (President of Urbanation), taken from the above Globe article. (Sorry, it’s behind a paywall.)

  “Price growth between the two building types [mid-rise and high-rise] began to converge in 2018, and in Q1-2019, buildings under 12 storeys saw average resale prices per square foot grow 10 per cent year-over-year, compared to 6.5 per cent for buildings of 12 or more storeys,” Mr. Hildebrand said. “We may be now entering back into a period of outperformance of mid-rise buildings as the market is shifting.”

  2019.06.01

• Best innovative suite design

  

  Junction House won “Best Innovative Suite Design” at the 39th BILD Awards (2019) last night. A big congrats to the team. Below is the floor plan that won. It is a 2 bedroom suite from our two-storey House Collection (JH_2B_H1).

  

  This design is fundamental to Junction House. It is why the project is called what it is. The goal was to create a suite that felt less like a condo, and more like a low-rise single-family home. Credit to Superkul Architects, and the rest of the team, for figuring it all out. There was a long list of requirements.

  We wanted dedicated kitchen (+ island), dining, and living areas. (The living area is also wider than what you’d typically find.) We wanted a terrace with (standard) water and BBQ connections. We wanted the bedrooms upstairs for privacy/separation. We wanted both of them to have direct window exposure. And we wanted a master ensuite bathroom with a double vanity.

  The House Collection includes some of my favorite suites in the building, which is why — full disclosure — I’m going to be moving into one of them. If you’d like more information about Junction House, reach out to Paul Johnston and his team at info@junctionhouse.ca or at 416-900-6076.

  2019.05.04

• Junction House Community Meeting

  

  Okay, last Toronto-centric post for the week. We are back to regular scheduled programming tomorrow.

  Later this month, Councillor Gord Perks will be hosting a community meeting for Junction House (see conceptual rendering above).

  You can find all of the details, here, on the Globizen blog. But pop it into your calendars: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 from 7 to 9pm.

  Even if you can’t attend, definitely weigh in on the rooftop public art component over in the comments on the Globizen blog.

  I hope to see you all there. It’s always nice when happy people come out.

  2017.11.04

• Pay what you want

  In my pricing class this morning we looked at the strategy used by Radiohead with the release of its In Rainbows album. For those of you who aren’t fans, what they did was offer up the new album via their website on the basis that customers could pay whatever they want.

  At first blush this probably sounds ridiculous. But if you break it down, it turns out to be pure brilliance.

  First, it’s important to understand how pricing overall works in the music industry. In the olden days when people still bought CDs, an artist might make 15% of that sale price. So if you buy an album for $14.99, the artist’s royalties would be in and around the range of $2.25. The rest goes to the record label, their overhead and so on.

  With the advent of iTunes, artists still make around 15%. But now a typical album costs $9.99. This is because overhead costs are lower for an online-only store. Still, the artist now only makes $1.50 or so per album sale.

  In case the of Radiohead, their record label contract had expired and so they decided to self release In Rainbows. This obviously means that they were able to cut out a lot of overhead and other expenses. But would it not have been better to just sell the album for a fixed, but discounted, price?

  The thing is, when you give people the option of paying nothing, you maximize your potential distribution. This is good when you’re trying to sell concert tickets, merchandise and other revenue producing items in the future.

  But interestingly enough, when you give people the option you also maintain a business model. In this case, it turns out that, on average, people paid over $3 per album. This may sound irrational, but people do it for a number of reasons: because they’re big fans, because they want to support the artist, etc.

  Whatever the reason, Radiohead actually brought in more per album than if they had gone through a record label and/or sold through iTunes. In fact, In Rainbows netted the group over 8x more than their previous album Hail to the Thief – which was released through a record label. 

  This got me thinking.

  What other markets would be well served by a pricing model such as this? Could you make parking a pay what you want service? I know that Shakespeare in High Park uses the model. So does it only work for artistic markets where people feel an emotional connection? I certainly don’t think we could sell condos using this approach.

  2013.09.30