According to Sequoia Capital, Americans spent $4 trillion on retail shopping last year - 95% of which was still done in traditional brick-and-mortar stores. I’m actually a bit surprised by how high this number is. I would have thought that a larger percentage of people would be shopping online.
For me personally, I’d say that my split might be close to 50/50. From furniture to clothes, to even a new bicycle, I buy a lot online, come to think of it. Part of the reason is convenience, but the other reason is that I like having easy access to a broader selection.
About the only thing I really prefer buying in person is groceries. However even there I’ve been exploring ways to regularize shipments of the items I typically buy. I can’t recall where I read it, but I remember seeing something about less than 1% of groceries in America being bought online.
Intuitively, the percentage of online sales is only going to rise, particularly given the shift to mobile. Consumers can now shop anytime, anywhere. Real estate companies and retailers certainly need to pay attention.
But just like the internet didn’t make cities irrelevant, I don’t think it’ll make shopping in person completely extinct. As Sequoia Capital points out in its article, mobile phones are creating new opportunities at the intersection of online and real world shopping.
So while I don’t know what the future online/offline split might be, I suspect that the two worlds will continue to blur together. I might buy a bicycle online, but when it comes time to service it, I’d like to be able to bring it into a store.
Politics rewards consistency. Even if you’re wrong, it’s better to be consistently wrong than come across as wavering - however noble and rational the intentions may be. And that’s exactly what happened with Rob Ford and his commitment to subways, subways and subways.
John Lorinc of Spacing wrote an interesting piece yesterday on how, despite all the debating that went on, Ford is delivering what he said he was going to deliver: a subway. It doesn’t matter that all technical and financial considerations were thrown out the window, he got it funded.
As I said earlier this week, I think the Scarborough line is the wrong subway to be building and that the downtown relief line is infinitely more important for the region. However, Lorinc makes a good case in his article for why this line will not be funded despite the current focus on subways, subways and subways:
“Fourth, it’s important to recognize that there will be one notably perverse exception to the foregoing, which is the [Insert Euphemism Here] Relief Line. I do admire Josh Matlow’s advocacy on this front. But Ford will never take up the DRL cause because (i) he doesn’t get the purpose of said extension
When I told my friends that I had booked a weekend getaway to Detroit, I got responses like: “By accident?” and “Why on earth would you want to go there?” But that’s exactly what I did last weekend. I went to Detroit.
I wanted to see first hand what was going on the city. I wanted to see if it really was the lost cause that the media makes it out to be or if it had the potential to come back. I had been following Dan Gilbert’s efforts to seemingly buy up every building in downtown Detroit and I wanted to see if those efforts were working. I’m an optimist, so I wanted to believe that they were.
I also have friends who live in the city and a friend who’s working on a number of urban renewal initiatives in the midtown area. It was a great opportunity for me to get a local point of view and also learn about what’s coming in the development pipeline. So I met my friend Alex - pronounced Ay-lex in Michigan - and I got the run down on Detroit.
Detroit is an absolutely fascinating city. As I mentioned before, it’s like visiting the ruins of a former empire, but one that’s recent enough to remind you of how ephemeral success can be. Whether it’s the
According to Sequoia Capital, Americans spent $4 trillion on retail shopping last year - 95% of which was still done in traditional brick-and-mortar stores. I’m actually a bit surprised by how high this number is. I would have thought that a larger percentage of people would be shopping online.
For me personally, I’d say that my split might be close to 50/50. From furniture to clothes, to even a new bicycle, I buy a lot online, come to think of it. Part of the reason is convenience, but the other reason is that I like having easy access to a broader selection.
About the only thing I really prefer buying in person is groceries. However even there I’ve been exploring ways to regularize shipments of the items I typically buy. I can’t recall where I read it, but I remember seeing something about less than 1% of groceries in America being bought online.
Intuitively, the percentage of online sales is only going to rise, particularly given the shift to mobile. Consumers can now shop anytime, anywhere. Real estate companies and retailers certainly need to pay attention.
But just like the internet didn’t make cities irrelevant, I don’t think it’ll make shopping in person completely extinct. As Sequoia Capital points out in its article, mobile phones are creating new opportunities at the intersection of online and real world shopping.
So while I don’t know what the future online/offline split might be, I suspect that the two worlds will continue to blur together. I might buy a bicycle online, but when it comes time to service it, I’d like to be able to bring it into a store.
Politics rewards consistency. Even if you’re wrong, it’s better to be consistently wrong than come across as wavering - however noble and rational the intentions may be. And that’s exactly what happened with Rob Ford and his commitment to subways, subways and subways.
John Lorinc of Spacing wrote an interesting piece yesterday on how, despite all the debating that went on, Ford is delivering what he said he was going to deliver: a subway. It doesn’t matter that all technical and financial considerations were thrown out the window, he got it funded.
As I said earlier this week, I think the Scarborough line is the wrong subway to be building and that the downtown relief line is infinitely more important for the region. However, Lorinc makes a good case in his article for why this line will not be funded despite the current focus on subways, subways and subways:
“Fourth, it’s important to recognize that there will be one notably perverse exception to the foregoing, which is the [Insert Euphemism Here] Relief Line. I do admire Josh Matlow’s advocacy on this front. But Ford will never take up the DRL cause because (i) he doesn’t get the purpose of said extension
When I told my friends that I had booked a weekend getaway to Detroit, I got responses like: “By accident?” and “Why on earth would you want to go there?” But that’s exactly what I did last weekend. I went to Detroit.
I wanted to see first hand what was going on the city. I wanted to see if it really was the lost cause that the media makes it out to be or if it had the potential to come back. I had been following Dan Gilbert’s efforts to seemingly buy up every building in downtown Detroit and I wanted to see if those efforts were working. I’m an optimist, so I wanted to believe that they were.
I also have friends who live in the city and a friend who’s working on a number of urban renewal initiatives in the midtown area. It was a great opportunity for me to get a local point of view and also learn about what’s coming in the development pipeline. So I met my friend Alex - pronounced Ay-lex in Michigan - and I got the run down on Detroit.
Detroit is an absolutely fascinating city. As I mentioned before, it’s like visiting the ruins of a former empire, but one that’s recent enough to remind you of how ephemeral success can be. Whether it’s the
Brandon Donnelly
Daily insights for city builders. Published since 2013 by Toronto-based real estate developer Brandon Donnelly.
. I’m guessing it will be years before someone with the mayor’s block-headed tenacity emerges to champion a line with a politically inconvenient name and an eye-bulging price tag.
In fact, the sheer heft of the relief line will allow marginally useful yet politically supported subway projects — extensions in the west end to Sherway Gardens or up Yonge to Richmond Hill – to continue to elbow their way to the front of the line, just exactly as the Scarborough subway project did. Indeed, because we no longer care, at any level of government, about subjecting our transit investment choices to a rational policy framework, the most crucial project in the GTA will always lose out in the funding lottery because it has the most diffuse constituency and the most conceptually complicated purpose.”
The disparaging thing about these two paragraphs is that it’s a sad reality.
or the decline of Detroit, the mighty fall all the time. But it’s precisely this rich history that makes the city so interesting. When you walk inside some of the buildings built during the first half of the 20th century, you can’t help but be reminded of how important of a city Detroit was for America. Detroit was filthy rich.
But even beyond the showpieces like the Guardian Building and Fisher Building, the Detroit landscape is littered with office and industrial buildings that would make any developer want to line up. One neighbourhood in particular that stood out for me was Rivertown. Running along the water just east of downtown, the area is filled with old brick buildings and the right street scale for a magnificent neighbourhood.
However, I was told that this neighbourhood doesn’t really have a lot of momentum behind it. Most efforts are focused on the downtown and midtown areas. Still, I couldn’t help but imagine the area as a thriving mixed-use community. In the shorter term, I also thought the area could be really cool as an entertainment and nightlife district similar to Kuntspark in Munich, which was also a former industrial zone.
Downtown and midtown are where it’s most evident that change is underway though. “Opportunity Detroit” is the slogan of Dan Gilbert’s real estate company, called Bedrock, and you see it plastered up in all of the windows downtown. Offices buildings are now leasing up and new retailers are moving in. I was told that five years ago none of this was happening. Woodward Ave was empty.
As you move north towards midtown, you then discover a Michigan first: an urban depressed freeway. Detroit was the first city in America to build these and it’s certainly going to work in its favour as its city centre is reborn. I can only imagine how much more divided the city would be today had the freeways that wrap the core been built as elevated overpasses.
But that’s not the case. Downtown and midtown are decently connected, albeit different in feel. In midtown, the buildings are more midrise in scale, the streets are broader, and the retail appears further along. There’s a Whole Foods that just opened up and fantastic new coffee shop called Great Lakes Coffee. It was busy when I was there on Sunday morning and I was told that it’s really the first place in Detroit where people could go to hang out and work.
As you leave the core of the city things really fall off though. This is where Detroit becomes a prairie city and you see the one house on a block condition that the media likes to capture. It’s here where it becomes apparent that Detroit is simply too big, geographically, for its current population. You have infrastructure in place for 2 million people and yet a tax base of 700,000 people. No wonder it went bankrupt.
So like many others have suggested before, I think Detroit needs to figure out a way to shrink in order to eventually grow. Just like a company going through restructuring, Detroit has to rid itself of some its liabilities. It’s going to have to take that write-down.
At the same time, the population needs to be somehow consolidated and something needs to be done with all its excess land (urban agriculture is one idea). Jane Jacobs taught us that towers in a park don’t create urban vibrancy and the same can be said for houses in fields. Detroit is fragmented and divided. More so than dangerous, most of the city just feels eerily deserted.
However, despite these challenges, two things really stood out for me during my visit.
The first is that Detroit still very much has an ethos of production. It likes building and making things, and it’s visible in the emergence of brands like Shinola who are producing bikes, watches and leather goods right in the city.
The second is that there’s a palatable sense of possibility. Detroit hasn’t lost that entrepreneurial spirit that made it a leader in manufacturing, music and sports. A great example of this is the Green Garage in midtown, which is a former Model T showroom turned sustainable coworking lab for Detroit entrepreneurs.
But perhaps the best way to sum up this spirit is through a line I saw on a neon sign downtown on Woodward Ave.
It read: “Nothing stops Detroit.”
; and (ii)
because the project
doesn’t butter his bread, electorally speaking
. I’m guessing it will be years before someone with the mayor’s block-headed tenacity emerges to champion a line with a politically inconvenient name and an eye-bulging price tag.
In fact, the sheer heft of the relief line will allow marginally useful yet politically supported subway projects — extensions in the west end to Sherway Gardens or up Yonge to Richmond Hill – to continue to elbow their way to the front of the line, just exactly as the Scarborough subway project did. Indeed, because we no longer care, at any level of government, about subjecting our transit investment choices to a rational policy framework, the most crucial project in the GTA will always lose out in the funding lottery because it has the most diffuse constituency and the most conceptually complicated purpose.”
The disparaging thing about these two paragraphs is that it’s a sad reality.
or the decline of Detroit, the mighty fall all the time. But it’s precisely this rich history that makes the city so interesting. When you walk inside some of the buildings built during the first half of the 20th century, you can’t help but be reminded of how important of a city Detroit was for America. Detroit was filthy rich.
But even beyond the showpieces like the Guardian Building and Fisher Building, the Detroit landscape is littered with office and industrial buildings that would make any developer want to line up. One neighbourhood in particular that stood out for me was Rivertown. Running along the water just east of downtown, the area is filled with old brick buildings and the right street scale for a magnificent neighbourhood.
However, I was told that this neighbourhood doesn’t really have a lot of momentum behind it. Most efforts are focused on the downtown and midtown areas. Still, I couldn’t help but imagine the area as a thriving mixed-use community. In the shorter term, I also thought the area could be really cool as an entertainment and nightlife district similar to Kuntspark in Munich, which was also a former industrial zone.
Downtown and midtown are where it’s most evident that change is underway though. “Opportunity Detroit” is the slogan of Dan Gilbert’s real estate company, called Bedrock, and you see it plastered up in all of the windows downtown. Offices buildings are now leasing up and new retailers are moving in. I was told that five years ago none of this was happening. Woodward Ave was empty.
As you move north towards midtown, you then discover a Michigan first: an urban depressed freeway. Detroit was the first city in America to build these and it’s certainly going to work in its favour as its city centre is reborn. I can only imagine how much more divided the city would be today had the freeways that wrap the core been built as elevated overpasses.
But that’s not the case. Downtown and midtown are decently connected, albeit different in feel. In midtown, the buildings are more midrise in scale, the streets are broader, and the retail appears further along. There’s a Whole Foods that just opened up and fantastic new coffee shop called Great Lakes Coffee. It was busy when I was there on Sunday morning and I was told that it’s really the first place in Detroit where people could go to hang out and work.
As you leave the core of the city things really fall off though. This is where Detroit becomes a prairie city and you see the one house on a block condition that the media likes to capture. It’s here where it becomes apparent that Detroit is simply too big, geographically, for its current population. You have infrastructure in place for 2 million people and yet a tax base of 700,000 people. No wonder it went bankrupt.
So like many others have suggested before, I think Detroit needs to figure out a way to shrink in order to eventually grow. Just like a company going through restructuring, Detroit has to rid itself of some its liabilities. It’s going to have to take that write-down.
At the same time, the population needs to be somehow consolidated and something needs to be done with all its excess land (urban agriculture is one idea). Jane Jacobs taught us that towers in a park don’t create urban vibrancy and the same can be said for houses in fields. Detroit is fragmented and divided. More so than dangerous, most of the city just feels eerily deserted.
However, despite these challenges, two things really stood out for me during my visit.
The first is that Detroit still very much has an ethos of production. It likes building and making things, and it’s visible in the emergence of brands like Shinola who are producing bikes, watches and leather goods right in the city.
The second is that there’s a palatable sense of possibility. Detroit hasn’t lost that entrepreneurial spirit that made it a leader in manufacturing, music and sports. A great example of this is the Green Garage in midtown, which is a former Model T showroom turned sustainable coworking lab for Detroit entrepreneurs.
But perhaps the best way to sum up this spirit is through a line I saw on a neon sign downtown on Woodward Ave.
