As a general rule, building a new building is easier than trying to do surgery on an existing one, because you never know exactly what you're going to find when you start the latter. But there are instances where surgery is necessary.
According to Bloomberg, developers in London are becoming increasingly interested in the airspace above existing buildings, and it supposedly started because of some policy changes:
In 2020, then housing minister Robert Jenrick introduced reforms that relaxed rules to add airspace builds above existing buildings. Owners can now construct additional residential stories to either expand their own dwelling or to create new units altogether without going through full planning permissions, which are often a long and costly process. This was part of a broader set of reforms to boost housing supply, and the current Labour government has not shelved these changes.
Here's an example site listed for £150,000:
The site currently comprises the roof and airspace above a 3-storey mixed-use residential-led block (Block B) within The Glassworks Development.
The existing development was constructed in 2017 and comprises 23 residential apartments plus ground floor commercial space, all of which are sold off on long leases.
I had an old boss who was very interested in this idea. For him, it was "free" land and a way to further extract value from an existing real estate portfolio. Of course, it's also a way to build new homes in already built-up cities. Some industry people think that London could accommodate up to 180,000 new homes using this strategy.
But these are not simple builds. Can the existing structure and foundations support additional levels? How do you modify the existing elevator(s) while the building below remains occupied? How do you do the mechanical tie-ins without impacting the suite(s) below?
All of this makes me wonder how feasible it will be for London to build 180,000 new homes in this way. If it can, that would be a great accomplishment, and one that other cities should aim to emulate. But regardless, I'd love to get under the hood of one of these projects.
Cover photo by Travis Fish on Unsplash
As a general rule, building a new building is easier than trying to do surgery on an existing one, because you never know exactly what you're going to find when you start the latter. But there are instances where surgery is necessary.
According to Bloomberg, developers in London are becoming increasingly interested in the airspace above existing buildings, and it supposedly started because of some policy changes:
In 2020, then housing minister Robert Jenrick introduced reforms that relaxed rules to add airspace builds above existing buildings. Owners can now construct additional residential stories to either expand their own dwelling or to create new units altogether without going through full planning permissions, which are often a long and costly process. This was part of a broader set of reforms to boost housing supply, and the current Labour government has not shelved these changes.
Here's an example site listed for £150,000:
The site currently comprises the roof and airspace above a 3-storey mixed-use residential-led block (Block B) within The Glassworks Development.
The existing development was constructed in 2017 and comprises 23 residential apartments plus ground floor commercial space, all of which are sold off on long leases.
I had an old boss who was very interested in this idea. For him, it was "free" land and a way to further extract value from an existing real estate portfolio. Of course, it's also a way to build new homes in already built-up cities. Some industry people think that London could accommodate up to 180,000 new homes using this strategy.
But these are not simple builds. Can the existing structure and foundations support additional levels? How do you modify the existing elevator(s) while the building below remains occupied? How do you do the mechanical tie-ins without impacting the suite(s) below?
All of this makes me wonder how feasible it will be for London to build 180,000 new homes in this way. If it can, that would be a great accomplishment, and one that other cities should aim to emulate. But regardless, I'd love to get under the hood of one of these projects.
Cover photo by Travis Fish on Unsplash
London has a breed of specialist developers that are known as rooftop or airspace developers. What these developers do is build on top of existing and occupied buildings -- mostly residential. Firm examples include Upspace and Apex Airspace. According to this recent WSJ article, the city is also making moves to relax regulations so that more of these top-ups can be completed.
Brokerage Knight Frank estimates that in central London alone there are probably 23,000 buildings that could support a few extra floors, resulting in upwards of 41,000 new homes. I have done early feasibility studies for similar projects here in Toronto and they're not simple to execute. But building structures are typically constructed with a factor of safety and so, in some/most cases, you can build a little on top without doing any additional reinforcing. (Note: I am not a structural engineer.)
In any case, the benefits of airspace projects are obvious. You're creating additional supply in a tight housing market like London. Similar to Toronto's laneway housing program, it's not going to completely solve the larger problem of affordable housing. But every bit of new housing helps, regardless of where it lands on the spectrum of affordability.
One of the drawbacks, which is the headline of the above WSJ article, is that penthouse residents are getting demoted in the process. They're going from penthouse to sub, or sub-sub, or sub-sub-sub penthouse. They also need to endure a bit of construction right above them. Cry me a river?
But what is also important to point out is that there are lots of buildings out there which are facing capital expenditure shortfalls. They have maintenance and repair demands that simply aren't adequately funded. Adding additional floors can be a way for these buildings to generate that cash and, in some cases, residents are even partnering with airspace developers to share in some of the profit upside.
Not surprisingly, these sorts of arrangements are seemingly being met with a fair bit of support. Because in these instances, your options are basically as follows: Either you cut a repairs and maintenance check right now or you support a bit of development and then hopefully you'll be the one receiving a check in the future. I suspect we'll be seeing a lot more of this, not just in London, but in cities all around the world.
Photo by Sometimes I Snap on Unsplash
London has a breed of specialist developers that are known as rooftop or airspace developers. What these developers do is build on top of existing and occupied buildings -- mostly residential. Firm examples include Upspace and Apex Airspace. According to this recent WSJ article, the city is also making moves to relax regulations so that more of these top-ups can be completed.
Brokerage Knight Frank estimates that in central London alone there are probably 23,000 buildings that could support a few extra floors, resulting in upwards of 41,000 new homes. I have done early feasibility studies for similar projects here in Toronto and they're not simple to execute. But building structures are typically constructed with a factor of safety and so, in some/most cases, you can build a little on top without doing any additional reinforcing. (Note: I am not a structural engineer.)
In any case, the benefits of airspace projects are obvious. You're creating additional supply in a tight housing market like London. Similar to Toronto's laneway housing program, it's not going to completely solve the larger problem of affordable housing. But every bit of new housing helps, regardless of where it lands on the spectrum of affordability.
One of the drawbacks, which is the headline of the above WSJ article, is that penthouse residents are getting demoted in the process. They're going from penthouse to sub, or sub-sub, or sub-sub-sub penthouse. They also need to endure a bit of construction right above them. Cry me a river?
But what is also important to point out is that there are lots of buildings out there which are facing capital expenditure shortfalls. They have maintenance and repair demands that simply aren't adequately funded. Adding additional floors can be a way for these buildings to generate that cash and, in some cases, residents are even partnering with airspace developers to share in some of the profit upside.
Not surprisingly, these sorts of arrangements are seemingly being met with a fair bit of support. Because in these instances, your options are basically as follows: Either you cut a repairs and maintenance check right now or you support a bit of development and then hopefully you'll be the one receiving a check in the future. I suspect we'll be seeing a lot more of this, not just in London, but in cities all around the world.
Photo by Sometimes I Snap on Unsplash
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
