# Mirvish+Gehry and the story of 4 heritage buildings

**Published by:** [Brandon Donnelly](https://brandondonnelly.com/)
**Published on:** 2013-12-07
**Categories:** architect, architecture, david-mirvish, design, development-proposal, entertainment-district, frank-gehry, globe-and-mail, heritage, heritage-buildings, king-street-west, ontario-heritage-act, preservation, progress, starchitect, toronto, uncategorized
**URL:** https://brandondonnelly.com/mirvishgehry-and-the-story-of-4-heritage-buildings

## Content

I am a real estate developer and I believe in progress. But I also fundamentally believe in balancing progress and preservation. I’ve said this before. This morning, Alex Bozikovic of the Globe and Mail, published a piece on the epic Mirvish + Gehry proposal for Toronto’s Entertainment District. It’s called, “Frank Gehry and David Mirvish’s tall order in Toronto.” Now, I’ve said before that I like this project. I don’t mind the height and I don’t buy the argument that there aren’t enough public spaces in the area. There’s David Pecaut Square directly to the south that could use a few more warm bodies in it. But as I also said before, I think the key concern here is one of heritage. There are 4 heritage designated buildings on the site dating back to as early as 1901. Here’s where they sit: The Anderson Building (1915) is particularly unique. Here’s a larger photo (via blogTO): So while I’m excited by the prospect of a real Gehry project in Toronto, I think we need to figure out a way to find a balance. Preserve the facades, build on top, or relocate them. Do something besides wipe the slate clean. As Bozikovic rightly points out in his article, “Toronto has a sophisticated culture of working with heritage buildings.” There are lots of great examples of how we managed to move forward as a city, without erasing our past. And in many ways, I see this ability to work with and build upon heritage buildings as an emerging Toronto vernacular. I mean, what could be more appropriate for the most diverse city on the planet than an architectural style–of our own–that blends and layers history with disparate design ideologies. I sense an opportunity. We could have Gehry’s white sinuous curves drape over the heritage buildings. Make them become a literal unveiling of Toronto’s past and a metaphor for the sophisticated way in which we build upon legacy. It’s too easy to just demolish everything. We’re better than that.

## Publication Information

- [Brandon Donnelly](https://brandondonnelly.com/): Publication homepage
- [All Posts](https://brandondonnelly.com/): More posts from this publication
- [RSS Feed](https://api.paragraph.com/blogs/rss/@brandondonnelly): Subscribe to updates
- [Twitter](https://twitter.com/donnelly_b): Follow on Twitter

## Optional

- [Collect as NFT](https://brandondonnelly.com/mirvishgehry-and-the-story-of-4-heritage-buildings): Support the author by collecting this post
- [View Collectors](https://brandondonnelly.com/mirvishgehry-and-the-story-of-4-heritage-buildings/collectors): See who has collected this post